Bolden v. Rushing et al
Filing
109
ORDER granting 89 MOTION An Order requiring the attached complete official transcripts of the depositions of Officers Brent Rushing and James Matthew Culbertson; Plaintiff Kenneth S. Bolden; Plaintiff's expert witness, Melvin L. Tucker; and, the official transcript. Signed by Honorable G Ross Anderson, Jr on 11/24/09. (gkra, )
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF SOUTH CAROLINA GREENVILLE DIVISION Kenneth S. Bolden, Plaintiff, v. Brent Rushing, James Matthews Culbertson, & City of Simpsonville Police Department, Defendants. __________________________________ ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )
No.: 6:07-cv-2985-GRA ORDER (Written Opinion)
This matter is before this Court for a ruling on Plaintiff's Motion to Supplement District Court Record, for which a hearing was held on November 23, 2009. Federal Rule of Appellate Procedure 10(e)(2) states that: (1) If anything material to either party is omitted from or misstated in the record by error or accident, the omission or misstatement may be corrected and a supplemental record may be certified and forwarded: ... (B) by the district court before or after the record has been forwarded. Fed. R. App. P. 10(e)(2). In seeking modification of the record, Plaintiff must demonstrate that the evidence to be supplemented was before the District Court in the course of its proceedings leading to the judgment under review and was mistakenly omitted from the record. See Robinson v. Sanctuary Record Groups, Ltd., 589 F.Supp.2d 273 (S.D.N.Y. 2008).
Page 1 of 2
This Court finds that Plaintiff has met his burden. The record indicates that this Court, in previous orders regarding this case, referenced information from the discovery depositions and plea hearing. Additionally, it appears that both parties used the documents in their arguments before this Court. Finally, there is no
indication that the documents were omitted for any reason other than mistake or accident. IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that Plaintiff's Motion to Supplement District Court Record is granted. IT IS SO ORDERED.
November 24 , 2009 Anderson, South Carolina
Page 2 of 2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?