Kiger v. Citifinancial Inc
ORDER denying 4 Motion to Stay. Instead, the court dismissed this action because all claims between the parties are being submitted to arbitration. Signed by Honorable Henry M Herlong, Jr on 3/5/09.(jtho, )
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF SOUTH CAROLINA GREENVILLE DIVISION Faye W. Kiger, Plaintiff, vs. CitiFinancial, Inc., Defendant. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )
C.A. No. 6:09-502-HMH OPINION & ORDER
This matter is before the court on the parties' consent motion to stay this action pending arbitration. After review, the court denies the parties' consent motion to stay pending arbitration. Instead, the court dismisses this action because all claims between the parties are being submitted to arbitration. See Choice Hotels Int'l, Inc. v. BSR Tropicana Resort, Inc., 252 F.3d 707, 709-10 (4th Cir. 2001) ("[D]ismissal is a proper remedy when all of the issues presented in a lawsuit are arbitrable."). IT IS SO ORDERED.
s/Henry M. Herlong, Jr. United States District Judge Greenville, South Carolina March 5, 2009
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?