Hughey v. Regions Mortgage et al

Filing 18

JUDGMENT that case is dismissed without prejudice and without issuance and service of process. (alew, )

Download PDF
AO 450 (Rev. 01/09) Judgment in a Civil Action UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT fo r the District of South Carolina ) Debbie Hughey ) Plaintiff ) v. ) Civil Action No. 6:09-2462-HFF ) Regions Mortgage, Union Planters Bank NA, Union Planters Mortgage, Regions Bank, Ms. M. Glass, City of Mauldin, Greenville Health System, Greenville Health System University Medical Center, Greenville Health System Board of Trustees, Greenville Health System University Medical Center Board of Trustees, Ms. Delaine A. Frierson, State of SC Human Affairs Commission, Schmidt Mortgage Corp., Vincent Schmidt, Pearce W. Fleming, D. Randolph Whitt, Fleming and Whitt Law Firm, Nathan Earle, Temple Mann Brigg and Hill Law Firm, Beverly J. Finkel, Finkel Law Firm, LLC, Eastwood Construction Comp., Owner CEO and President of Eastwood Construction Comp. John Does 1-7, US Court of Appeal, Court of Clerk of Appeal, HUD, Joe Brooks, Everette H. Babb, Babb & Brown, Laurel Meadows Homeowners Association ) Defendant ) JUDGMENT IN A CIVIL ACTION The court has ordered that (check one): the plaintiff (name) defendant (name) interest at the rate of dollars ($ %, plus postjudgment interest at the rate of recover from the the amount of ), which includes prejudgment %, along with costs. the plaintiff recover nothing, the action be dismissed on the merits, and the defendant (name) recover costs from the plaintiff (name) . other: this action is dismissed without prejudice and issuance of service. . This action was (check one): tried by a jury with Judge rendered a verdict. tried by Judge was reached. decided by Judge Recommendation. Henry F. Floyd presiding, and the jury has without a jury and the above decision adopting the Report and . Date: October 26, 2009 CLERK OF COURT s/Angela Lewis Signature of Clerk or Deputy Clerk

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?