Gainey v. Kelly et al

Filing 41

ORDER ACCEPTING 34 Report and Recommendations; DENYING 32 Motion for Default Judgment filed by Danny Ray Gainey. Signed by Honorable Terry L Wooten on 12/9/2011. (mbro, )

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF SOUTH CAROLINA Danny Ray Gainey, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) vs. ) ) ) Nurse R. Kelly, Nurse Nancy Hiest, and ) Nurse Dawn Colman, ) ) Defendants. ) ___________________________________ ) Civil Action No. 6:11-1247-TLW-KFM ORDER Danny Ray Gainey, (“Plaintiff”), brought this civil action, pro se, pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983 on May 25, 2011. (Doc. # 1). This matter now comes before the Court for review of the Report and Recommendation (“the Report”) filed by United States Magistrate Judge Kevin F. McDonald, to whom this case had previously been assigned. In the Report, the Magistrate Judge recommends that the Plaintiff’s Motion for Default Judgment be denied. (Doc. # 34). Objections to the Report were due on November 17, 2011. The Plaintiff filed no objections to the Report. This Court is charged with conducting a de novo review of any portion of the Magistrate Judge=s Report and Recommendation to which a specific objection is registered, and may accept, reject, or modify, in whole or in part, the recommendations contained in that Report. 28 U.S.C. ' 636. In the absence of objections to the Report of the Magistrate Judge, this Court is not required to give any explanation for adopting the recommendation. See Camby v. Davis, 718 F.2d 198, 199 (4th Cir. 1983). The Court has carefully reviewed the Magistrate Judge=s Report. For the reasons articulated by the Magistrate Judge, it is hereby ORDERED that the Magistrate Judge=s Report and Recommendation is ACCEPTED. (Doc. # 34). Therefore, Plaintiff’s Motion for Default Judgment is DENIED. (Doc. # 32). IT IS SO ORDERED. ____s/Terry L. Wooten____ United States District Judge December 9, 2011 Florence, South Carolina 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?