Cherry Road Investors 2 LLC et al v. TIC Properties LLC et al
Filing
61
ORDER FOR JUDGMENT Signed by Honorable Timothy M Cain on 1/15/2014. (gpre, )
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF SOUTH CAROLINA
GREENVILLE DIVISION
Cherry Road Investors 2, LLC, Cherry Road
Investors 5, LLC, Cherry Road Investors 6, LLC,
Cherry Road Investors 13, LLC, Cherry Road
Investors 17, LLC, Cherry Road Investors 21,
LLC, and Cherry Road Investors 26, LLC,
Civil Action No. 6:12-03076-TMC
Plaintiffs/Petitioners,
ORDER FOR JUDGMENT
vs.
TIC Properties, LLC, TIC Properties
Management, LLC, Poinsett Capital Advisors,
LLC, Barry Gruebbell, John W. Boyd, and Paul
M. Aiesi,
Defendants/Respondents.
This matter came before the court following the court’s order for remand (ECF No. 58).
On September 24, 2013, the arbitrator issued a clarification of an ambiguity in the parties’
arbitration award (ECF No. 60), which the parties agree renders unnecessary further motion
practice or proceedings. Therefore, based on all the files, records, and proceedings herein, and
based on the parties’ stipulation (ECF No. 60), the court issues the following order.
ORDER FOR JUDGMENT
1. The arbitrator’s award dated July 27, 2012 (ECF No. 17-12), as clarified on September
25, 2012 (ECF No. 17-13) and September 24, 2013 (ECF No. 60), is hereby confirmed in
all respects.
2. The parties’ motions to vacate, modify, or correct the arbitration award, to the extent not
already addressed by the court or voluntarily dismissed by the parties, are hereby denied
in all respects.
1
3. All claims, counterclaims, and third-party claims, including Defendants’ / Respondents’
Direct Claim (ECF No. 33), are hereby dismissed with prejudice and without costs or fees
to any party.
LET FINAL JUDGMENT BE ENTERED ACCORDINGLY.
s/Timothy M. Cain
Timothy M. Cain
United States District Court Judge
Anderson, South Carolina
January 15, 2014
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?