Sennott v. Adams et al

Filing 58

JUDGMENT / The court has ordered that this case is dismissed with prejudice. (abuc)

Download PDF
AO 450 (SCD 04/2010) Judgment in a Civil Action UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT for the District of South Carolina Mark P. Sennott, Plaintiff ) ) ) ) ) v. Edward S Adams; Michael R. Monahan; Adams Monahan, LLP; Loblolly, Inc., f/k/a Scio Diamond Technology Corporation; Scio Diamond Technology Corporation, f/k/a Krossbow Holding Corporation; John Does 1-10, Civil Action No. 6:13-cv-02813-BHH Defendants and Apollo Diamond Nominal Defendant JUDGMENT IN A CIVIL ACTION The court has ordered that (check one): ’ the plaintiff (name) recover from the defendant (name) which includes prejudgment interest at the rate of the amount of %, plus postjudgment interest at the rate of dollars ($ %, along with costs. ’ the plaintiff recover nothing, the action be dismissed on the merits, and the defendant (name) recover costs from the plaintiff (name) . O other: It is ordered that this case is dismissed with prejudice. This action was (check one): ’ tried by a jury, the Honorable ’ tried by the Honorable presiding, and the jury has rendered a verdict. presiding, without a jury and the above decision was reached. O decided by the Honorable Bruce Howe Hendricks. Date: January 20, 2015 ), ROBIN L. BLUME, CLERK OF COURT s/Ashley Buckingham Signature of Clerk or Deputy Clerk

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?