Tenaglia v. Commissioner Social Security Administration

Filing 35

ORDER re 34 Stipulation filed by Commissioner Social Security Administration. The court orders the Defendant to pay the sum of $2,500.00 in attorney's fees, subject to the Treasury Offset Program if the prevail ing party owes a debt to the federal government. Motions terminated: 33 MOTION for Attorney Fees Pursuant to the Equal Access to Justice Act, 28 U.S.C. § 2412 filed by Theresa Tenaglia. Signed by Honorable R Bryan Harwell on 6/28/2016. (abuc)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF SOUTH CAROLINA GREENVILLE DIVISION Theresa Tenaglia, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) ) Carolyn W. Colvin, Acting Commissioner ) of Social Security, ) ) Defendant. ) ____________________________________) C/A No.: 6:14-cv-04920-RBH ORDER On June 16, 2016, Plaintiff filed a motion for attorney’s fees pursuant to the Equal Access to Justice Act (“EAJA”), 28 U.S.C. § 2412, on the basis that the position taken by the defendant in this action was not substantially justified. On June 28, 2016, the parties filed a joint stipulation indicating that the parties agreed to an EAJA award of $2,500.00 in attorney’s fees. The stipulation provides that fees awarded are subject to be offset if the prevailing party owes a debt to the federal government. Based on the foregoing and after considering the briefs and materials submitted by the parties, the court orders the Defendant to pay the sum of $2,500.00 in attorney’s fees, subject to the Treasury Offset Program if the prevailing party owes a debt to the federal government. However, the payment shall be made payable to the claimant pursuant to Astrue v. Ratliff, 130 S.Ct. 2521 (2010), and mailed to his attorney, with a copy to the claimant. IT IS SO ORDERED. June 28, 2016 Florence, South Carolina s/ R. Bryan Harwell R. Bryan Harwell United States District Judge

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?