Brooks v. Thomas
Filing
22
JUDGMENT / The court has ordered that this case is dismissed without prejudice. (abuc)
AO 450 (SCD 04/2010) Judgment in a Civil Action
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
for the
District of South Carolina
Marcus Brooks,
)
)
)
)
)
Petitioner
v.
Warden Thomas
Respondent
Civil Action No.
6:15-cv-02963-RMG
JUDGMENT IN A CIVIL ACTION
The court has ordered that (check one):
the petitioner (name)
recover from the respondent (name)
which includes prejudgment interest at the rate of
the amount of
%, plus postjudgment interest at the rate of
dollars ($
%, along with
costs.
the petitioner recover nothing, the action be dismissed on the merits, and the respondent (name)
recover costs from the petitioner (name)
.
O other: the petitioner, Marcus Brooks, shall take nothing of the respondent, Warden Thomas, as to the
petition filed pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §2241 and this case is dismissed without prejudice.
This action was (check one):
tried by a jury, the Honorable
tried by the Honorable
presiding, and the jury has rendered a verdict.
presiding, without a jury and the above decision was reached.
O decided by the Honorable Richard M. Gergel, United States District Judge, presiding, adopting the Report and
Recommendations set forth by the Honorable Kevin McDonald, United States Magistrate Judge, which recommended
granting the respondent’s motion to dismiss.
Date: October 26, 2015
ROBIN L. BLUME, CLERK OF COURT
s/Ashley Buckingham
Signature of Clerk or Deputy Clerk
),
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?