Hunter v. Florence County Detention Center et al

Filing 17

ORDER RULING ON REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION 10 . It is the judgment of this Court that Defendant Florence County Detention Center is hereby DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE and without service of process. Signed by Honorable Mary Geiger Lewis on 1/21/2016. (kric, )

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF SOUTH CAROLINA GREENVILLE DIVISION ONDRE TREVEZ HUNTER. Plaintiff, vs. FLORENCE COUNTY DETENTION CENTER; KENNY BOONE, The Head Sheriff; JOEY NORRIS, The Major; and JOYCE BRUNSON, The Captain, Defendants. § § § § CIVIL ACTION NO. 6:16-00031-MGL-KFM § § § § § § ORDER ADOPTING THE REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION AND DISMISSING FLORENCE COUNTY DETENTION CENTER WITHOUT PREJUDICE AND WITHOUT SERVICE OF PROCESS This case was filed as a 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action. Plaintiff is proceeding pro se. The matter is before the Court for review of the Report and Recommendation (Report) of the United States Magistrate Judge suggesting that the Florence County Detention Center be summarily dismissed without prejudice and without service of process. The Report was made in accordance with 28 U.S.C. § 636 and Local Civil Rule 73.02 for the District of South Carolina. The Magistrate Judge makes only a recommendation to this Court. The recommendation has no presumptive weight. The responsibility to make a final determination remains with the Court. Mathews v. Weber, 423 U.S. 261, 270 (1976). The Court is charged with making a de novo determination of those portions of the Report to which specific objection is made, and the Court may accept, reject, or modify, in whole or in part, the recommendation of the Magistrate Judge or recommit the matter with instructions. 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1). The Magistrate Judge filed the Report on January 12, 2016, and the Clerk of Court entered Plaintiff’s objections to the Report on January 21, 2016. The Court has reviewed the objections, but finds them without merit. Therefore, it will enter judgment accordingly. In his objections, Plaintiff agrees with the Magistrate Judge’s recommendation that Defendant Florence County Detention Center be summarily dismissed. Plaintiff additionally notes his desire to continue pursuing his action against the three remaining Defendants. As Plaintiff’s objections appear to support, rather than oppose, the Report, the Court overrules Plaintiff’s objections to the extent they contradict the Report. The Court points out that the Magistrate Judge authorized service of process on the three remaining Defendants, ECF No. 9, and the case remains pending as to those Defendants. After a thorough review of the Report and the record in this case pursuant to the standard set forth above, the Court overrules Plaintiff’s objections, adopts the Report, and incorporates it herein. Therefore, it is the judgment of this Court that Defendant Florence County Detention Center is hereby DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE and without service of process. 2 IT IS SO ORDERED. Signed this 21st day of January, 2016, in Columbia, South Carolina. s/ Mary Geiger Lewis MARY GEIGER LEWIS UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE ***** NOTICE OF RIGHT TO APPEAL The parties are hereby notified of the right to appeal this Order within thirty days from the date hereof, pursuant to Rules 3 and 4 of the Federal Rules of Appellate Procedure. 3

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?