Hunter v. Boone et al
ORDER RULING ON REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION 47 . It is the judgment of this Court Defendants' motion for summary judgment is GRANTED, Plaintiff's motion for default judgment is DENIED, and Plaintiffs motion for issuance of subpoenas is RENDERED MOOT. Signed by Honorable Mary Geiger Lewis on 2/3/2017. (kric, )
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF SOUTH CAROLINA
ONDRE TREVEZ HUNTER,
KENNY BOONE, JOYCE BRUNSON, and
§ CIVIL ACTION NO. 6:16-473-MGL-KFM
ORDER ADOPTING THE REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION,
GRANTING DEFENDANTS’ MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT,
DENYING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR DEFAULT JUDGMENT,
AND RENDERING AS MOOT PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR ISSUANCE OF SUBPOENAS
This case was filed as a 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action. The matter is before the Court for review
of the Report and Recommendation (Report) of the United States Magistrate Judge suggesting
Defendants’ motion for summary judgment be granted, Plaintiff’s motion for default judgment be
denied, and any pending dispositive motions be rendered moot. The Report was made in accordance
with 28 U.S.C. § 636 and Local Civil Rule 73.02 for the District of South Carolina.
The Magistrate Judge makes only a recommendation to this Court. The recommendation has
no presumptive weight. The responsibility to make a final determination remains with the Court.
Mathews v. Weber, 423 U.S. 261, 270 (1976). The Court is charged with making a de novo
determination of those portions of the Report to which specific objection is made, and the Court may
accept, reject, or modify, in whole or in part, the recommendation of the Magistrate Judge or
recommit the matter with instructions. 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1).
The Magistrate Judge filed the Report on January 18, 2017, but Plaintiff failed to file any
objections. “[I]n the absence of a timely filed objection, a district court need not conduct a de novo
review, but instead must ‘only satisfy itself that there is no clear error on the face of the record in
order to accept the recommendation.’” Diamond v. Colonial Life & Acc. Ins. Co., 416 F.3d 310, 315
(4th Cir. 2005) (quoting Fed. R. Civ. P. 72 advisory committee’s note). Moreover, a failure to
object waives appellate review. Wright v. Collins, 766 F.2d 841, 845-46 (4th Cir. 1985).
After a thorough review of the Report and the record in this case employing the standard set
forth above, the Court adopts the Report and incorporates it herein. Therefore, it is the judgment
of this Court Defendants' motion for summary judgment is GRANTED, Plaintiff's motion for
default judgment is DENIED, and Plaintiff’s motion for issuance of subpoenas is RENDERED
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Signed this 3rd day of February, 2017, in Columbia, South Carolina.
s/ Mary Geiger Lewis
MARY GEIGER LEWIS
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
NOTICE OF RIGHT TO APPEAL
Plaintiff is hereby notified of the right to appeal this Order within thirty days from the date
hereof, pursuant to Rules 3 and 4 of the Federal Rules of Appellate Procedure.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?