Darby v. Commissioner of Social Security Administration

Filing 27

ORDER re 25 Stipulation filed by Commissioner of Social Security Administration. The court orders the defendant to pay the sum of $5,365.38 attorney's fees and $22.25 in expenses pursuant to EAJA, subject to the Treasury Offset Program if the prevailing party owes a debt to the federal government. Motions terminated: 24 MOTION for Attorney Fees filed by James B Darby. Signed by Honorable R Bryan Harwell on 12/6/2017. (abuc)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF SOUTH CAROLINA GREENVILLE DIVISION James B. Darby, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) ) Nancy A. Berryhill, Acting Commissioner ) of Social Security, ) ) Defendant. ) ____________________________________) C/A No.: 6:16-cv-00729-RBH ORDER On November 20, 2017, Plaintiff filed a motion for attorney’s fees pursuant to the Equal Access to Justice Act (“EAJA”), 42 U.S.C. § 2412, on the basis that the position taken by the defendant in this action was not substantially justified. In the motion, Plaintiff requested attorney’s fees in the amount of $5,531.25 and expenses in the amount of $22.25. On November 30, 2017, the parties filed a stipulation for an EAJA award of $5,365.38 in attorney’s fees and $22.25 in expenses. Based on the foregoing and after considering the briefs and materials submitted by the parties, the court orders the defendant to pay the sum of $5,365.38 attorney’s fees and $22.25 in expenses pursuant to EAJA, subject to the Treasury Offset Program if the prevailing party owes a debt to the federal government. However, the payment shall be made payable to the claimant pursuant to Astrue v. Ratliff, 130 S.Ct. 2521 (2010) and mailed to his attorney, with a copy to the claimant. IT IS SO ORDERED. December 6, 2017 Florence, South Carolina s/ R. Bryan Harwell R. Bryan Harwell United States District Judge

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?