Dixon v. Commissioner of Social Security Administration

Filing 22

ORDER granting 18 Motion to Remand. This court REVERSES the Commissioner's decision under sentence four of 42 U.S.C. § 405(g) with a REMAND of the case to the Commissioner for further administrative proceedings. Signed by Honorable J Michelle Childs on 4/19/2017.(abuc)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF SOUTH CAROLINA GREENVILLE DIVISION GREGORY CARL DIXON, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) ) NANCY A. BERRYHILL, Acting ) Commissioner of Social Security,1 ) ) Defendant. ) ____________________________________) Civil Action No. 6:16-cv-01000-JMC ORDER Defendant, Nancy A. Berryhill, Acting Commissioner of Social Security, has moved the Court, pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 405(g), to enter a judgment with an order of reversal with remand to her for further administrative proceedings. (ECF No. 18.) Defendant further represents that Plaintiff consents to this motion. Id. at 1. Pursuant to the power of this court to enter a judgment affirming, modifying, or reversing the Commissioner’s decision with remand in Social Security actions under sentence four of 42 U.S.C. § 405(g), and in light of the Commissioner’s request for remand of this action for further proceedings, this court hereby REVERSES the Commissioner’s decision under sentence four of 42 U.S.C. § 405(g) with a REMAND of the case to the Commissioner for further administrative proceedings. See Shalala v. Schaefer, 509 U.S. 292 (1993). 1 Nancy A. Berryhill became the Acting Commissioner of Social Security on January 23, 2017. Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 25(d), Nancy A. Berryhill is substituted for former Acting Commissioner Carolyn W. Colvin as a Defendant in this lawsuit. 1 IT IS SO ORDERED. United States District Judge April 19, 2017 Columbia, South Carolina

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?