Iseral v. Commissioner of Social Security Administration

Filing 23

ORDER granting 20 Motion to Remand, REVERSING the decision of the Commissioner pursuant to Sentence Four of 42 U.S.C. § 405(g), and REMANDING this matter to the agency to conduct further review and to take further action in accord with the Commissioner's motion for remand. Signed by Honorable Richard M Gergel on 1/24/2017.(abuc)

Download PDF
... .~ UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF SOUTH CAROLINA Jeanette Jamai Israel, Plaintiff, vs. Carolyn W. Colvin, Acting Commissioner of Social Security, Defendant. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) c.A. No. 6:16-1319-RMG ORDER This matter comes before the Court on the Commissioner's motion to remand this Social Security Act appeal to the agency for further evaluation and review and conducting of a new administrative hearing. (Dkt. No. 20). The Commissioner has stated in the motion that upon remand, the agency will do the following: (1) allow Plaintiff to submit additional evidence; (2) re-evaluate Plaintiffs mental impairments; (3) reconsider Plaintiffs RFC; (4) evaluate further the opinions of Dr. Boyd; (5) evaluate further whether Plaintiff is capable of performing prior relevant work; and (6) obtain, if warranted, vocational expert evidence to determine of there are a significant number ofjobs in the national economy that Plaintiff can perform. Plaintiff has filed no objections to the Commissioner's motion for remand. After a careful review of the record in this matter, the Court GRANTS the motion for remand, REVERSES the decision of the Commissioner pursuant to Sentence Four of 42 U.S.C. § 405(g), and REMANDS this matter to the agency to conduct further review and to take further action in accord with the Commissioner's motion for remand. -1­ AND IT IS SO ORDERED. January~j2017 Charleston, South Carolina -2­

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?