Johnson v. Commissioner of Social Security Administration

Filing 23

ORDER adopting 20 Report and Recommendation. The Court ADOPTS the Report and Recommendation as the order of this Court, REVERSES the decision of the Commissioner pursuant to Sentence Four of 42 U.S.c. § 405(g), and REMANDS the matter to the Commissioner for further proceedings. Signed by Honorable Richard M Gergel on 4/28/2017.(abuc)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF SOUTH CAROLINA Eva Renee Johnson, Plaintiff, vs. Nancy A. Berryhill, Acting Commissioner of Social Security, Defendant. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Civil Action No. 6: 16-2669-RMG ORDER This matter comes before the Court for judicial review of the final decision of the Commissioner of Social Security denying Plaintiff s application for Disability Insurance Benefits ("DIB") and "Supplemental Security Income ("SSI"). In accordance with 28 U.S.C. § 636(b) and Local Rule 73.02, D.S.C., this matter was referred to the United States Magistrate Judge for pretrial handling. The Magistrate Judge issued a Report and Recommendation (R & R) on April 13,2017, recommending that the decision of the Commissioner be reversed and remanded to the agency because the Administrative Law Judge (1) failed to consider Plaintiffs documented IQ score at age 12 showing a full scale IQ of 53 and a verbal IQ of 56 in determining whether Plaintiff met the requirements of Listing 12.05(B); and (2) failed to consider evidence from Plaintiff's public school records when determining whether Plaintiff met the requirements of Listing 12.05(C). (Dkt. No. 20 at 8-15). The Commissioner has advised the Court that she does not intend to file objections to the R & R. (Dkt. No. 22). The Court has reviewed the R & R and the record evidence and finds that the Magistrate -1­ Judge has ably addressed the factual and legal issues in this matter. Therefore, the Court ADOPTS the Report and Recommendation as the order of this Court, REVERSES the decision of the Commissioner pursuant to Sentence Four of 42 U.S.c. § 405(g), and REMANDS the matter to the Commissioner for further proceedings consistent with this order. AND IT IS SO ORDERED. Richard MarK ergel United States District Judge Charleston, South Carolina April ~~ 2017 -2­

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?