Tucker v. Spartanburg, City of et al
Filing
19
JUDGMENT / The court has ordered that this action is dismissed without prejudice. (abuc)
AO 450 (SCD 04/2010) Judgment in a Civil Action
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
for the
District of South Carolina
Dantonio Tucker,
Plaintiff
v.
City of Spartanburg; Spartanburg City Police
Department; Johnathan Lawson, all in their
individual and official capacities,
)
)
)
)
)
Civil Action No.
7:15-cv-02116-BHH
Defendant
JUDGMENT IN A CIVIL ACTION
The court has ordered that (check one):
the plaintiff (name)
recover from the defendant (name)
which includes prejudgment interest at the rate of
the amount of
%, plus postjudgment interest at the rate of
dollars ($
%, along with
costs.
the plaintiff recover nothing, the action be dismissed on the merits, and the defendant (name)
recover costs from the plaintiff (name)
.
O other: the plaintiff, Dantonio Tucker, shall take nothing of the defendants; City of Spartanburg, Spartanburg City
Police Department, and Johnathan Lawson, from the complaint filed pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983 and this action is
dismissed without prejudice.
This action was (check one):
tried by a jury, the Honorable
tried by the Honorable
presiding, and the jury has rendered a verdict.
presiding, without a jury and the above decision was reached.
O decided by the Honorable Bruce Howe Hendricks, United States District Judge, presiding, adopting the Report and
Recommendation set forth by the Honorable Kevin McDonald, United States Magistrate Judge, which recommended
dismissing the complaint without prejudice.
Date: October 8, 2015
ROBIN L. BLUME, CLERK OF COURT
s/A. Buckingham
Signature of Clerk or Deputy Clerk
),
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?