Hughes v. Bank of America National Association

Filing 27

ORDER granting 26 Motion to Stay Scheduling Order Deadlines Pending Ruling on Defendant's Motion to Dismiss. Signed by Honorable Mary Geiger Lewis on 4/25/2016.(abuc)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF SOUTH CAROLINA (Spartanburg Division) PHILLIP FRANCIS LUKE HUGHES, on behalf of the ESTATE OF JANE K. HUGHES, JOANNE HAFTER, and all others similarly situated, Plaintiffs, Case No. 7:15-cv-05083-MGL v. BANK OF AMERICA, N.A. Defendant. ORDER ON MOTION TO STAY SCHEDULING ORDER DEADLINES PENDING RULING ON DEFENDANT’S MOTION TO DISMISS PLAINTIFFS’ THIRD AMENDED COMPLAINT The Court has reviewed Defendant Bank of America, N.A.’s (“Bank of America”), Motion to Stay Scheduling Order Deadlines Pending Ruling on Defendant’s Motion to Dismiss Plaintiffs’ Third Amended Complaint, and it appears to the Court that, in the interest of economy of time and effort for the court, counsel, and the litigants, the Motion to Stay should be granted. Therefore, it is ORDERED that Defendant Bank of America’s Motion to Stay Scheduling Order Deadlines Pending Ruling on Defendant’s Motion to Dismiss Plaintiffs’ Third Amended Complaint is GRANTED. The deadlines set forth in this Court’s Scheduling Order (ECF No. 24) other than those relating to the briefing of Defendant’s Motion to Dismiss are hereby stayed pending a ruling on Defendant’s Motion to Dismiss Plaintiffs’ Third Amended Complaint. AND IT IS SO ORDERED. s/Mary Geiger Lewis ______________________________ The Honorable Mary Geiger Lewis United States District Judge April 25, 2016 Columbia, South Carolina 1

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?