Hughes v. Bank of America National Association
Filing
27
ORDER granting 26 Motion to Stay Scheduling Order Deadlines Pending Ruling on Defendant's Motion to Dismiss. Signed by Honorable Mary Geiger Lewis on 4/25/2016.(abuc)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF SOUTH CAROLINA
(Spartanburg Division)
PHILLIP FRANCIS LUKE HUGHES, on behalf of
the ESTATE OF JANE K. HUGHES, JOANNE
HAFTER, and all others similarly situated,
Plaintiffs,
Case No. 7:15-cv-05083-MGL
v.
BANK OF AMERICA, N.A.
Defendant.
ORDER ON MOTION TO STAY SCHEDULING ORDER DEADLINES PENDING
RULING ON DEFENDANT’S MOTION TO DISMISS PLAINTIFFS’ THIRD
AMENDED COMPLAINT
The Court has reviewed Defendant Bank of America, N.A.’s (“Bank of America”),
Motion to Stay Scheduling Order Deadlines Pending Ruling on Defendant’s Motion to Dismiss
Plaintiffs’ Third Amended Complaint, and it appears to the Court that, in the interest of economy
of time and effort for the court, counsel, and the litigants, the Motion to Stay should be granted.
Therefore, it is ORDERED that Defendant Bank of America’s Motion to Stay Scheduling Order
Deadlines Pending Ruling on Defendant’s Motion to Dismiss Plaintiffs’ Third Amended
Complaint is GRANTED. The deadlines set forth in this Court’s Scheduling Order (ECF No.
24) other than those relating to the briefing of Defendant’s Motion to Dismiss are hereby stayed
pending a ruling on Defendant’s Motion to Dismiss Plaintiffs’ Third Amended Complaint.
AND IT IS SO ORDERED.
s/Mary Geiger Lewis
______________________________
The Honorable Mary Geiger Lewis
United States District Judge
April 25, 2016
Columbia, South Carolina
1
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?