Gardner v. BMW Manufacturing Co LLC et al
Filing
56
JUDGMENT / The court has ordered that this action is dismissed with prejudice pursuant to FRCP 41. (abuc)
AO 450 (SCD 04/2010) Judgment in a Civil Action
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
for the
District of South Carolina
David Gardner,
Plaintiff,
v.
BMW Manufacturing Co. LLC; Management
Analysis & Utilization, Inc., d/b/a MAU Workforce
Solutions, Inc.; Tier One Solutions, Inc.,
)
)
)
)
)
Civil Action No.
7:16-cv-03458-MGL
Defendants,
JUDGMENT IN A CIVIL ACTION
The court has ordered that (check one):
the plaintiff (name)
recover from the defendant (name)
which includes prejudgment interest at the rate of
the amount of
%, plus postjudgment interest at the rate of
dollars ($
),
%, along with
costs.
the plaintiff recover nothing, the action be dismissed on the merits, and the respondent (name)
recover costs from the plaintiff (name)
.
O other: the plaintiff, David Gardner, shall take nothing of the defendants, BMW Manufacturing Co. LLC,
Management Analysis & Utilization, Inc., and Tier One Solutions, Inc., as to the complaint filed pursuant to 42 U.S.C.
§12117 and this action is dismissed with prejudice pursuant to FRCP 41.
This action was (check one):
tried by a jury, the Honorable
tried by the Honorable
presiding, and the jury has rendered a verdict.
presiding, without a jury and the above decision was reached.
O decided by the Honorable Mary Geiger Lewis, United States District Judge, presiding, adopting the Report and
Recommendation set forth by the Honorable Jacquelyn D. Austin, United States Magistrate Judge, recommended
dismissal of the complaint with prejudice.
Date: June 30, 2017
ROBIN L. BLUME, CLERK OF COURT
s/A. Buckingham
Signature of Clerk or Deputy Clerk
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?