Maruka Machinery Co Ltd v. Hi Tech Systems Inc

Filing 35

CONFIDENTIALITY ORDER granting (34) Motion for Confidentiality Order in case 7:17-cv-00490-MGL; granting (31) Motion for Confidentiality Order in case 7:17-cv-00917-MGL Signed by Honorable Mary Geiger Lewis on 9/12/2017.Associated Cases: 7:17-cv-00490-MGL, 7:17-cv-00917-MGL(abuc)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF SOUTH CAROLINA SPARTANBURG DIVISION Maruka Machinery Co. Ltd., ) ) Case No. 7:17-cv-00490-MGL Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) ) Hi Tech Systems, Inc., ) ) Defendant. ) ______________________________________________________________________________ Hi Tech Systems, Inc., ) ) Case No. 7:17-cv-00917-MGL Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) ) Maruka Machinery Co. Ltd., ) ) Defendant. ) ______________________________________________________________________________ CONFIDENTIALITY ORDER Whereas, the parties to this Consent Confidentiality Order (“parties”), have stipulated that certain discovery material is and should be treated as confidential, and have agreed to the terms of this order; accordingly, it is this 8th day of September, 2017, ORDERED: 1. Scope. All documents produced in the course of discovery, all responses to discovery requests and all deposition testimony and deposition exhibits and any other materials which may be subject to discovery, including documents, testimony or any other materials produced by non-parties in response to a subpoena or voluntarily (hereinafter collectively “documents”) shall be subject to this Order concerning confidential information as set forth below. This order shall also apply to any inspections of the Kobelco Construction Machinery U.S.A., Inc. Page 1 of 16 site in Moore, South Carolina, along with any documents or other records created during or in connection with such inspections. 2. Form and Timing of Designation. Confidential documents shall be so designated by placing or affixing the word “CONFIDENTIAL” on the document in a manner which will not interfere with the legibility of the document and which will permit complete removal of the Confidential designation. Documents shall be designated CONFIDENTIAL prior to, or contemporaneously with, the production or disclosure of the documents. Inadvertent or unintentional production of documents without prior designation as confidential shall not be deemed a waiver, in whole or in part, of the right to designate documents as confidential as otherwise allowed by this Order. 3. Documents Which May be Designated Confidential. Any party may designate documents as confidential but only after review of the documents by an attorney1 who has, in good faith, determined that the documents contain information protected from disclosure by statute, sensitive personal information, trade secrets, or confidential research, development, or commercial information. The certification shall be made concurrently with the disclosure of the documents, using the form attached hereto at Attachment A which shall be executed subject to the standards of Rule 11 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Information or documents which are available in the public sector may not be designated as confidential. 1 The attorney who reviews the documents and certifies them to be CONFIDENTIAL must be admitted to the Bar of at least one state but need not be admitted to practice in the District of South Carolina and need not apply for pro hac vice admission. By signing the certification, counsel submits to the jurisdiction of this court in regard to the certification. Page 2 of 16 4. Depositions. Portions of depositions shall be deemed confidential only if designated as such when the deposition is taken or within seven business days after receipt of the transcript. Such designation shall be specific as to the portions to be protected. 5. Protection of Confidential Material. a. General Protections. Documents designated CONFIDENTIAL under this Order shall not be used or disclosed by the parties or counsel for the parties or any other persons identified below (¶ 6.b.) for any purposes whatsoever other than preparing for and conducting the litigation in which the documents were disclosed (including any appeal of that litigation). The parties shall not disclose documents designated as confidential to putative class members not named as plaintiffs in putative class litigation unless and until one or more classes have been certified. b. Limited Third Party Disclosures. The parties and counsel for the parties shall not disclose or permit the disclosure of any documents designated CONFIDENTIAL under the terms of this Order to any other person or entity except as set forth in subparagraphs (1)-(5) below, and then only after the person to whom disclosure is to be made has executed an acknowledgment (in the form set forth at Attachment B hereto), that he or she has read and understands the terms of this Order and is bound by it. Subject to these requirements, the following categories of persons may be allowed to review documents which have been designated CONFIDENTIAL pursuant to this Order: (1) counsel and employees of counsel for the parties who have responsibility for the preparation and trial of the lawsuit; Page 3 of 16 (2) parties and employees of a party to this Order but only to the extent counsel shall certify that the specifically named individual party or employee’s assistance is necessary to the conduct of the litigation in which the information is disclosed2; (3) court reporters engaged for depositions and those persons, if any, specifically engaged for the limited purpose of making photocopies of documents; (4) consultants, investigators, or experts (hereinafter referred to collectively as “experts”) employed by the parties or counsel for the parties to assist in the preparation and trial of the lawsuit; provided, however, that at least five (5) business days prior to disclosure pursuant to this provision, the party seeking to disclose the documents or information designated as CONFIDENTIAL, shall disclose to the producing party (or non-party) the name and employer of the expert, during which time the producing party (or non-party) may file an objection to such disclosure with this Court. If such an objection is filed, the party seeking disclosure shall not make such disclosure unless and until such time as the Court overrules such objection; and (5) other persons only upon consent of the producing party (or non-party) or upon order of the court and on such conditions as are agreed to or ordered. 2 At or prior to the time such party or employee completes his or her acknowledgment of review of this Order and agreement to be bound by it (Attachment B hereto), counsel shall complete a certification in the form shown at Attachment C hereto. Counsel shall retain the certification together with the form signed by the party or employee. Page 4 of 16 c. Control of Documents. Counsel for the parties shall take reasonable efforts to prevent unauthorized disclosure of documents designated as Confidential pursuant to the terms of this order. Counsel shall maintain a record of those persons, including employees of counsel, who have reviewed or been given access to the documents along with the originals of the forms signed by those persons acknowledging their obligations under this Order. d. Copies. All copies, duplicates, extracts, summaries or descriptions (hereinafter referred to collectively as “copies”), of documents designated as Confidential under this Order or any portion of such a document, shall be immediately affixed with the designation “CONFIDENTIAL” if the word does not already appear on the copy. All such copies shall be afforded the full protection of this Order. 6. Filing of Confidential Materials. In the event a party seeks to file any material that is subject to protection under this Order with the court, that party shall take appropriate action to insure that the documents receive proper protection from public disclosure including: (1) filing a redacted document with the consent of the party who designated the document as confidential; (2) where appropriate (e.g. in relation to discovery and evidentiary motions), submitting the documents solely for in camera review; or (3) where the preceding measures are not adequate, seeking permission to file the document under seal pursuant to the procedural steps set forth in Local Civil Rule 5.03, DSC, or such other rule or procedure as may apply in the relevant jurisdiction. Absent extraordinary circumstances making prior consultation impractical or inappropriate, the party seeking to submit the document to the court shall first consult with counsel for the party or non-party who designated the document as confidential to determine if some measure less restrictive than filing the document under seal may serve to provide adequate Page 5 of 16 protection. This duty exists irrespective of the duty to consult on the underlying motion. Nothing in this Order shall be construed as a prior directive to the Clerk of Court to allow any document be filed under seal. The parties understand that documents may be filed under seal only with the permission of the court after proper motion pursuant to Local Civil Rule 5.03. 7. Greater Protection of Specific Documents. No party may withhold information from discovery on the ground that it requires protection greater than that afforded by this Order unless the party moves for an Order providing such special protection. 8. Challenges to Designation as Confidential. Any CONFIDENTIAL designation is subject to challenge. The following procedures shall apply to any such challenge. a. The burden of proving the necessity of a Confidential designation remains with the party or non-party asserting confidentiality. b. A party who contends that documents or information designated CONFIDENTIAL are not entitled to confidential treatment shall give written notice to the party or non-party who affixed the designation of the specific basis for the challenge. The party or non-party who so designated the documents or information shall have fifteen (15) days from service of the written notice to determine if the dispute can be resolved without judicial intervention and, if not, the party challenging the designation may move the Court for an Order ruling that the document(s) should no longer be designated as confidential information. c. Notwithstanding any challenge to the designation of documents or information as confidential, all material previously designated CONFIDENTIAL shall continue to be treated as such subject to the full protections of this Order until one of the following occurs: Page 6 of 16 (1) the party or non-party who claims that the documents or information are confidential withdraws such designation in writing; ; or (2) the court rules that the documents or information should no longer be designated as confidential information. d. Challenges to the confidentiality of documents may be made at any time and are not waived by the failure to raise the challenge at the time of initial disclosure or designation. 9. Treatment on Conclusion of Litigation. a. Order Remains in Effect. All provisions of this Order restricting the use of documents designated CONFIDENTIAL shall continue to be binding after the conclusion of the litigation unless otherwise agreed or ordered. b. Return of CONFIDENTIAL Documents. Within thirty (30) days after the conclusion of the litigation, including conclusion of any appeal, all documents treated as confidential under this Order, including copies as defined above (¶6.d.) shall be returned to the producing party or non-party unless: (1) the document has been entered as evidence or filed (unless introduced or filed under seal); (2) the parties (or, if applicable, the nonparty) stipulate to destruction in lieu of return; or (3) as to documents containing the notations, summations, or other mental impressions of the receiving party, that party elects destruction. Notwithstanding the above requirements to return or destroy documents, counsel may retain attorney work product including an index which refers or relates to information designated CONFIDENTIAL so long as that work product does not duplicate verbatim substantial portions of the text of confidential documents. This work product Page 7 of 16 continues to be Confidential under the terms of this Order. An attorney may use his or her work product in a subsequent litigation provided that its use does not disclose the confidential documents. 10. Order Subject to Modification. This Order shall be subject to modification on motion of any party or any other person who may show an adequate interest in the matter to intervene for purposes of addressing the scope and terms of this Order. The Order shall not, however, be modified until the parties shall have been given notice and an opportunity to be heard on the proposed modification. 11. No Judicial Determination. This Order is entered based on the representations and agreements of the parties and for the purpose of facilitating discovery. Nothing herein shall be construed or presented as a judicial determination that any specific document or item of information designated as CONFIDENTIAL by counsel is subject to protection under Rule 26(c) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure or otherwise until such time as a document-specific ruling shall have been made. 12. Persons Bound. This Confidentiality Order is binding on (1) counsel who signed below and their respective law firms; and (2) their respective clients; (3) all third parties or non-parties described in Paragraph 6(b) who receive documents or information designated CONFIDENTIAL. In the event that additional counsel appear, or parties join or are joined in this action, they shall not have access to any documents or information designated as CONFIDENTIAL until the newly appearing counsel, or the newly joined party, by its counsel, has executed and filed with the Court its agreement to be fully bound by this Confidentiality Order. The terms of this Confidentiality Order shall apply to documents or information requested from and/or produced by any third parties or non-parties in response to a subpoena or voluntarily if the Page 8 of 16 third-party, non-party, or any party in the litigation, designates such documents or information as “CONFIDENTIAL” in accordance with this Protective Order. IT IS SO ORDERED. s/Mary Geiger Lewis ________________________________ The Honorable Mary Geiger Lewis UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE September 12, 2017 Columbia, South Carolina WE CONSENT: s/ Franklin J. Smith, Jr. Franklin J. Smith, Jr., D.S.C. ID No. 3898 Richardson Plowden & Robinson, P.A. Post Office Drawer 7788 Columbia, SC 29202 fsmith@richardsonplowden.com s/ Alice W. Parham Casey Alice W. Parham Casey, D.S.C. ID No. 9431 Wyche, P.A. 801 Gervais Street, Suite B Columbia, SC 29201 tcasey@wyche.com s/ Kelly M. Morrison Kelly M. Morrison, admitted pro hac vice Jenner & Block LLP 1099 New York Ave., NW, Suite 900 Washington, DC 20001 kmorrison@jenner.com Attorneys for Hi Tech Systems, Inc. Attorneys for Maruka Machinery Co., Ltd. Page 9 of 16 s/ H. Brewton Hagood. H. Brewton Hagood, D.S.C. I.D. No. 1658 Rosen, Rosen & Hagood, LLC 151 Meeting Street, Suite 400 P.O. Box 893 Charleston, SC 29402 bhagood@rrhlawfirm.com Attorneys for Kobelco Construction Machinery U.S.A., Inc. /s/ William S. F. Freeman William S. F. Freeman (D.S.C. #7416) THOMERSON FREEMAN & ROGERS P.C. Post Office Box 473 Greenville, South Carolina 29602 telephone: (864) 991-8329 fax: (864) 991-8330 email: william@tmlawpc.com John L. Watkins, Esq. John.Watkins@thompsonhine.com telephone: (404) 407-3648 J.A. Schneider, Esq. JA.Schneider@thompsonhine.com telephone:(404) 407-3637 THOMPSON HINE LLP Two Alliance Center 3560 Lenox Road, Suite 1600 Atlanta, Georgia 30326 Kazuhiro Shimizu Deborah Cazan Erica Harrison Arnold Alston & Bird LLP 1201 West Peachtree Street Atlanta, Georgia 30309-3424 Kazuhiro.Shimizu@alston.com Debbie.Cazan@alston.com EricaHarrison.Arnold@alston.com Of Counsel for Kobelco Construction Machinery U.S.A., Inc. LLC ATTORNEYS FOR NON-PARTY SUBPOENA RECIPIENT PANGBORN September 8, 2017 Page 10 of 16 ATTACHMENT A CERTIFICATION BY COUNSEL OF DESIGNATION OF INFORMATION AS CONFIDENTIAL IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF SOUTH CAROLINA SPARTANBURG DIVISION Maruka Machinery Co. Ltd., ) ) Case No. 7:17-cv-00490-MGL Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) ) Hi Tech Systems, Inc., ) ) Defendant. ) ______________________________________________________________________________ Hi Tech Systems, Inc., ) ) Case No. 7:17-cv-00917-MGL Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) ) Maruka Machinery Co. Ltd., ) ) Defendant. ) ______________________________________________________________________________ CERTIFICATION BY COUNSEL OF DESIGNATION OF INFORMATION AS CONFIDENTIAL Documents produced herewith [whose bates numbers are listed below (or) which are listed on the attached index] have been marked as CONFIDENTIAL subject to the Confidentiality Order entered in this action which Order is dated [confidentiality order date]. By signing below, I am certifying that I have personally reviewed the marked documents and believe, based on that review, that they are properly subject to protection under the terms of Paragraph 3 of the Confidentiality Order. Check and complete one of the two options below. I am a member of the Bar of the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina. My District Court Bar number is [District Court Bar #]. Page 11 of 16 I am not a member of the Bar of the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina but am admitted to the bar of one or more states. The state in which I conduct the majority of my practice is [state in which I practice most] where my Bar number is [that state's Bar #]. I understand that by completing this certification I am submitting to the jurisdiction of the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina as to any matter relating to this certification. Date: [date attachment A signed] [Signature of Counsel [s/name]] Signature of Counsel [Printed Name of Counsel [A]] Printed Name of Counsel Page 12 of 16 ATTACHMENT B ACKNOWLEDGMENT OF UNDERSTANDING AND AGREEMENT TO BE BOUND IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF SOUTH CAROLINA SPARTANBURG DIVISION Maruka Machinery Co. Ltd., ) ) Case No. 7:17-cv-00490-MGL Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) ) Hi Tech Systems, Inc., ) ) Defendant. ) ______________________________________________________________________________ Hi Tech Systems, Inc., ) ) Case No. 7:17-cv-00917-MGL Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) ) Maruka Machinery Co. Ltd., ) ) Defendant. ) ______________________________________________________________________________ ACKNOWLEDGEMENT OF UNDERSTANDING AND AGREEMENT TO BE BOUND The undersigned hereby acknowledges that he or she has read the Confidentiality Order dated [confidentiality order date], in the above captioned action, understands the terms thereof, and agrees to be bound by such terms. The undersigned submits to the jurisdiction of the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina in matters relating to the Confidentiality Order and understands that the terms of said Order obligate him/her to use discovery materials designated CONFIDENTIAL solely for the purposes of the above-captioned action, and not to disclose any such confidential information to any other person, firm or concern. The undersigned acknowledges that violation of the Stipulated Confidentiality Order may result in penalties for contempt of court. Name: [undersigned name [att B]] Page 13 of 16 Job Title: [Job Title [att B]] Employer: [Employer [att B]] Business Address: [Business Address [att B]] Date: [date attachment B signed] [Signature [attachment B]] Signature Page 14 of 16 ATTACHMENT C CERTIFICATION OF COUNSEL OF NEED FOR ASSISTANCE OF PARTY/EMPLOYEE IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF SOUTH CAROLINA SPARTANBURG DIVISION Maruka Machinery Co. Ltd., ) ) Case No. 7:17-cv-00490-MGL Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) ) Hi Tech Systems, Inc., ) ) Defendant. ) ______________________________________________________________________________ Hi Tech Systems, Inc., ) ) Case No. 7:17-cv-00917-MGL Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) ) Maruka Machinery Co. Ltd., ) ) Defendant. ) ______________________________________________________________________________ CERTIFICATION OF COUNSEL OF NEED FOR ASSISTANCE OF PARTY/EMPLOYEE Pursuant to the Confidentiality Order entered in this action, most particularly the provisions of Paragraph 6.b.2., I certify that the assistance of [name of assistant [att C]] is reasonably necessary to the conduct of this litigation and that this assistance requires the disclosure to this individual of information which has been designated as CONFIDENTIAL. I have explained the terms of the Confidentiality Order to the individual named above and will obtain his or her signature on an “Acknowledgment of Understanding and Agreement to be Bound” prior to releasing any confidential documents to the named individual and I will release only such confidential documents as are reasonably necessary to the conduct of the litigation. The individual named above is: Page 15 of 16 A named party; An employee of named party [employee of named party]. This employee’s job title is [employee's job title] and work address is [employee's work address]. Date: [date attachment C signed] [Signature [attachment C]] Signature Page 16 of 16

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?