Gavin v. Medi Credit Inc
ORDER re 1 Complaint filed by Earl Gavin. Plaintiff has failed to prosecute this case and has failed to comply with an order of this Court. Accordingly, this case is dismissed without prejudice pursuant to Rule 41 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Signed by Honorable Donald C Coggins, Jr on 4/12/2018. (abuc)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF SOUTH CAROLINA
Medi Credit Inc.,
Plaintiff, proceeding pro se, filed a complaint pursuant to the Telephone Consumer
Protection Act, 47 U.S.C. § 227, et seq. [Doc. 1.] By Order dated March 6, 2018, Plaintiff
was given an opportunity to provide the necessary information and paperwork to bring the
case into proper form for evaluation and possible service of process. [Doc. 9.] Plaintiff
was warned that failure to provide the necessary information and paperwork (payment of
the filing fee) within the timetable set in the Order may subject the case to dismissal.
However, Plaintiff has not responded to the Court’s Order and has failed to bring this case
into proper form by paying the full filing fee.
Plaintiff has failed to prosecute this case and has failed to comply with an order of
this Court. Accordingly, this case is dismissed without prejudice pursuant to Rule 41 of
the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. See Link v. Wabash R.R. Co., 370 U.S. 626 (1962).
IT IS SO ORDERED.
s/Donald C. Coggins, Jr.
United States District Judge
April 12, 2018
Spartanburg, South Carolina
NOTICE OF RIGHT TO APPEAL
The parties are hereby notified of the right to appeal this Order within the time period
set forth under Rules 3 and 4 of the Federal Rules of Appellate Procedure.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?