Terry et al v. Suntrust Banks Inc et al

Filing 59

ORDER dismissing without prejudice 33 Motion to Dismiss; dismissing without prejudice 34 Motion to Dismiss for Lack of Jurisdiction; dismissing without prejudice 35 Motion to Dismiss for Lack of Jurisdiction; dismissing without prejudice 36 Motion to Dismiss for Lack of Jurisdiction; dismissing without prejudice 37 Motion to Dismiss for Lack of Jurisdiction. Signed by Honorable Joseph F Anderson, Jr on 08/30/2010.(bshr, )

Download PDF
Terry et al v. Suntrust Banks Inc et al D o c . 59 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT F O R THE DISTRICT OF SOUTH CAROLINA A N D E R S O N /G R E E N W O O D DIVISION ) ) ) ) ) C / A No.: 8:09-2054-JFA ORDER In re § 1031 Exchange Litigation T h is matter comes before the court on the motions to dismiss for lack of standing and p e rs o n a l jurisdiction of the individual defendants. (ECF Nos. 48, 50, 51, 52, 53, 54, & 56.) O n January 20, 2010, the court issued an order (ECF No. 100) noting that the individual d e f en d a n ts had filed a notice of injunction (ECF No. 89) based on the November 23, 2009 o rd e r of the United States Bankruptcy Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, Richmond D iv is io n , confirming the Joint Chapter 11 Plan of LandAmerica Financial Group, Inc. and its Affiliated Debtors (the "Plan"), Chapter 11 Case No. 08-35994-KRH. Based on the b a n k ru p tcy court's confirmation of the Plan and its injunction provision, the court stayed this c a s e against the individual defendants for an indefinite period. In light of the age of the motions and the uncertainty as to when the Plan's injunctive p ro v is io n s will expire, the court hereby dismisses without prejudice with leave to refile each o f the motions to dismiss listed above. IT IS SO ORDERED. A u g u st 30, 2010 C o lu m b ia , South Carolina J o s e p h F. Anderson, Jr. U n ite d States District Judge Dockets.Justia.com

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?