Jackson v. Fuji Photo Film Inc et al

Filing 18

REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS that the defendant's 9 MOTION to Dismiss filed by FUJIFILM Manufacturing USA Inc, Fuji Photo Film Inc, be GRANTED in part and the entire matter STAYED pending the District Court's treatment of the undersigned� 39;s recommendation, in Jackson v. FUJIFILM Manufacturing USA, Inc., CA No. 8:09-1328-RBH-BHH. The defendant has leave to renew its motion to dismiss on all or some of the grounds already advanced at such time. Objections to R&R due by 12/2/2010. Signed by Magistrate Judge Bruce Howe Hendricks on 11/15/10. (Attachments: # 1 Objection Notice)(kmca) Modified on 11/16/2010: to capitalize STAYED per chambers (kmca).

Notice of Right to File Objections to Report and Recommendation
The parties are advised that they may file specific written objections to this Report and
Recommendation with the District Judge. Objections must specifically identify the portions of the
Report and Recommendation to which objections are made and the basis for such objections. “[I]n
the absence of a timely filed objection, a district court need not conduct a de novo review, but instead
must ‘only satisfy itself that there is no clear error on the face of the record in order to accept the
recommendation.’” Diamond v. Colonial Life & Acc. Ins. Co., 416 F.3d 310 (4th Cir. 2005) (quoting
Fed. R. Civ. P. 72 advisory committee’s note).
Specific written objections must be filed within fourteen (14) days of the date of service of
this Report and Recommendation. 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1); Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b); see Fed. R. Civ.
P. 6(a), (d). Filing by mail pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 5 may be accomplished by
mailing objections to:
Larry W. Propes, Clerk
United States District Court
300 East Washington St, Room 239
Greenville, South Carolina 29601
Failure to timely file specific written objections to this Report and Recommendation
will result in waiver of the right to appeal from a judgment of the District Court based upon
such Recommendation. 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1); Thomas v. Arn, 474 U.S. 140 (1985); Wright v.
Collins, 766 F.2d 841 (4th Cir. 1985); United States v. Schronce, 727 F.2d 91 (4th Cir. 1984).