Doe v. Haley et al

Filing 230

ORDER granting in part and denying in part 229 Motion to Redact 227 Transcript, 221 Transcript as set out. Signed by Honorable G Ross Anderson, Jr on 7/28/2014.(mbro, )

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
DISTRICT OF SOUTH CAROLINA
ANDERSON/GREENWOOD DIVISION
John Doe, minor child, by and through
his Guardian, Jane Doe,
Plaintiff,
v.
Nikki Haley, et al.,
Defendants.

)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)

C/A No.: 8:13-cv-01772-GRA

ORDER
(Written Opinion)

This matter comes before this Court on Plaintiff’s Motion to Redact Identifying
Information in Court Transcripts. ECF No. 229. After a thorough review of Plaintiff’s
Motion and the entire record, this Court finds that redaction of settlement amounts
conforms to this Court’s previous orders which maintained the confidentiality of the
settlement amounts. See ECF Nos. 179 & 222.

However, this Court does not find

that redaction of Plaintiff’s guardian ad litem’s name is necessary.

Therefore,

Plaintiff’s request shall be granted as to the settlement amounts, but not as to the
guardian ad litem’s name.
IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that Plaintiff’s Motion to Redact Identifying
Information in Court Transcripts is GRANTED in part.
IT IS SO ORDERED.

July 28 , 2014
Anderson, South Carolina
Page 1 of 1