Escalante v. Anderson County Sheriff's Department et al

Filing 15

ORDER re 12 MOTION to Dismiss filed by Janice W Rodgers, David L Rodgers. Plaintiff shall have through March 13, 2015 in which to file his response to the motion to dismiss. Signed by Magistrate Judge Jacquelyn D Austin on 3/3/2015. (abuc)

Download PDF
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE DISTRICT OF SOUTH CAROLINA ANDERSON/GREENWOOD DIVISION Mario Escalante, Plaintiff, vs. Anderson County Sheriff's Department, Sheriff John Skipper, Sergeant Andrew R. Hyslop, Deputy Brandon Surratt, City of Anderson Police Department, Chief of Police James S. Stewart, David L. Rodgers d/b/a Whitehall Express Mart, Janice W. Rodgers d/b/a Whitehall Express Mart, John Does 1-20, Defendants. ) Civil Action No.: 8:15-cv-00177-MGL-JDA ) ) ) ) ) ORDER ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Plaintiff brought this action seeking relief pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. On February 12, 2015, Defendants David L. Rodgers and Janice W. Rodgers filed a motion to dismiss. [Doc. 12.] Thus, Plaintiff's response was due on March 2, 2015. To date, Plaintiff has failed to file a response to the motion to dismiss. Therefore, IT IS ORDERED that Plaintiff shall have through March 13, 2015 in which to file his response to the motion to dismiss. Plaintiff is advised that if he fails to respond, this action will be subject to dismissal for failure to prosecute pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(b), and for failure to comply with this Court’s orders, pursuant to Rule 41(b) and the factors outlined in Chandler Leasing Corp. v. Lopez, 669 F.2d 919, 920 (4th Cir.1982). See Ballard v. Carlson, 882 F.2d 93 (4th Cir. 1989). The dismissal will be considered an adjudication on the merits, i.e., with prejudice. IT IS SO ORDERED. s/Jacquelyn D. Austin United States Magistrate Judge March 3, 2015 Greenville, South Carolina

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?