Wall v. Commissioner of Social Security Administration

Filing 32

ORDER granting 30 Motion for Attorney Fees per Rule 406b. Signed by Honorable Richard M Gergel on 5/1/2017.(abuc)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF SOUTH CAROLINA David Lee Wall, ) ) Plaintiff, Civil Action No. 8:15-2193-RMG ) ) vs. Nancy A. Berryhill, Acting Commissioner of Social Security Administration, Defendant. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ORDER This matter comes before the Court on Plaintiffs motion for approval of attorney's fees under 42 U.S.C. § 406(b). (Dkt. No. 30). Plaintiff seeks approval of an attorney's fee for his services on behalf of Plaintiff in federal court in the amount of $36,678.25, which represents 25% of the total back award obtained on behalf of Plaintiff. (Dkt. No. 30). Plaintiffs contract with his counsel provides for a 25% contingency fee. (Dkt. No. 30-2). The Defendant has advised the Court that she supports approval of the attorney fee request of Plaintiff, but correctly notes that upon receipt of the fee award under § 406(b), Plaintiff s counsel is obligated to pay to her client the amount previously awarded by the Court under EAJA. (Dkt. No. 31). The Court has reviewed the Plaintiffs motion in light of the standards set forth in Grisbrecht v. Barnhart, 535 U.S. 789, 808 (2002). The Court finds that pursuant to the Grisbrecht standards the proposed fee is reasonable and grants the Plaintiffs motion to approve the fee in the amount of $36,678.25. Upon receipt of this award, Plaintiffs counsel is directed to reimburse to Plaintiff $3,000.48 previously awarded under EAJA. (Dkt. No. 28). -1­ AND IT IS SO ORDERED. United States District Judge May _(_, 2017 Charleston, South Carolina -2­

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?