Miller v. Scaturo et al

Filing 34

ORDER RULING ON 32 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION It is ordered that defendant's 17 Motion for Summary Judgment is granted, and this case is dismissed with prejudice. Signed by Honorable Patrick Michael Duffy on 02/22/2016. (egra, )

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
DISTRICT OF SOUTH CAROLINA

Steve E. Miller, a/k/a Steven E. Miller,

)
)
Plaintiff,
)
)
vs.
)
)
Holly Scaturo, Galen Sanders,
)
)
Defendant.
)
____________________________________)

C.A. No. 8:15-2531-PMD

ORDER

This matter is before the court upon the magistrate judge's recommendation that defendant’s
motion for summary judgment be granted. The record includes the report and recommendation of
the United States Magistrate Judge made in accordance with this Court’s Order of Reference and
28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B). Because plaintiff is pro se, this matter was referred to the magistrate
judge.1
This Court is charged with conducting a de novo review of any portion of the magistrate
judge's report to which a specific objection is registered, and may accept, reject, or modify, in whole
or in part, the recommendations contained in that report. 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1). No objections have
been filed to the magistrate judge's report.
A review of the record indicates that the magistrate judge's report accurately summarizes this
case and the applicable law. For the reasons articulated by the magistrate judge, it is herewith
ORDERED that defendant’s motion for summary judgment is GRANTED and the case is
dismissed with prejudice.

1

Pursuant to the provisions of Title 28 United States Code, § 636(b)(1)(B), and Local
Rule 73.02(B)(2)(d), D.S.C., the magistrate judge is authorized to review all pretrial matters and
submit findings and recommendations to this Court.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, that the magistrate judge’s report and recommendation is
adopted as the order of this Court.
AND IT IS SO ORDERED.

February 22, 2016
Charleston, South Carolina