Walker v. Griswold
Filing
105
JUDGMENT in favor of Marilee Griswold against David Richard Walker, Jr as to the plaintiff's medical malpractice claim and this claim is dismissed. The court having sustained the objections to the report and recommendation further dismisses the Plaintiffs 42 U.S.C. § 1983 claim. (asni, )
AO 450 (Rev. 01/09) Judgment in a Civil Action
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
for the
District of South Carolina
David Richard Walker, Jr.,
Plaintiff
v.
Civil Action No.
8:16-00814-JMC
Dr. Marilee Griswold, M.D. Senior Psychiatrist
Defendant
JUDGMENT IN A CIVIL ACTION
The court has ordered that (check one):
the plaintiff (name)
dollars ($
recover from the defendant (name)
), which includes prejudgment interest at the rate of
the amount of
%, plus postjudgment interest at the rate of
%, along with costs.
the plaintiff recover nothing, the action be dismissed on the merits, and the defendant (name)
recover costs from the plaintiff (name)
.
O other: the Plaintiff shall take nothing of the Defendant as to the medical malpractice claim and this claim is
dismissed. The court having sustained the objections to the report and recommendation further dismisses the
Plaintiff’s 42 U.S.C. § 1983 claim.
This action was (check one):
tried by a jury with Judge
tried by Judge
presiding, and the jury has rendered a verdict.
without a jury and the above decision was reached.
O decided by the Honorable J. Michelle Childs, United States District Judge presiding. The Court having
accepted in part the report and recommendation of Magistrate Judge Jacquelyn D. Austin to dismiss as to the
plaintiff’s medical malpractice claim.
Date: September 29, 2017
CLERK OF COURT
s/Angie Snipes
Signature of Clerk or Deputy Clerk
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?