Walker v. Griswold

Filing 105

JUDGMENT in favor of Marilee Griswold against David Richard Walker, Jr as to the plaintiff's medical malpractice claim and this claim is dismissed. The court having sustained the objections to the report and recommendation further dismisses the Plaintiffs 42 U.S.C. § 1983 claim. (asni, )

Download PDF
AO 450 (Rev. 01/09) Judgment in a Civil Action UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT for the District of South Carolina David Richard Walker, Jr., Plaintiff v. Civil Action No. 8:16-00814-JMC Dr. Marilee Griswold, M.D. Senior Psychiatrist Defendant JUDGMENT IN A CIVIL ACTION The court has ordered that (check one): ’ the plaintiff (name) dollars ($ recover from the defendant (name) ), which includes prejudgment interest at the rate of the amount of %, plus postjudgment interest at the rate of %, along with costs. ’ the plaintiff recover nothing, the action be dismissed on the merits, and the defendant (name) recover costs from the plaintiff (name) . O other: the Plaintiff shall take nothing of the Defendant as to the medical malpractice claim and this claim is dismissed. The court having sustained the objections to the report and recommendation further dismisses the Plaintiff’s 42 U.S.C. § 1983 claim. This action was (check one): ’ tried by a jury with Judge ’ tried by Judge presiding, and the jury has rendered a verdict. without a jury and the above decision was reached. O decided by the Honorable J. Michelle Childs, United States District Judge presiding. The Court having accepted in part the report and recommendation of Magistrate Judge Jacquelyn D. Austin to dismiss as to the plaintiff’s medical malpractice claim. Date: September 29, 2017 CLERK OF COURT s/Angie Snipes Signature of Clerk or Deputy Clerk

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?