Ashby v. Tollison et al
JUDGMENT / The court has ordered that this action is dismissed without prejudice as to defendant Officer Morgan, and with prejudice for lack of prosecution and for failure to comply with this court's orders pursuant to Rule 41(b) as to defendants Officer Tollison and Major Joe Tyson. (abuc)
AO 450 (SCD 04/2010) Judgment in a Civil Action
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
District of South Carolina
William Mark Ashby,
Officer Tollison; Officer Morgan; Major Joe Tyson,
Civil Action No.
JUDGMENT IN A CIVIL ACTION
The court has ordered that (check one):
the plaintiff (name)
recover from the defendant (name)
which includes prejudgment interest at the rate of
the amount of
%, plus postjudgment interest at the rate of
%, along with
the plaintiff recover nothing, the action be dismissed on the merits, and the defendant (name)
recover costs from the plaintiff (name)
O other: the plaintiff, William Mark Ashby, shall take nothing of the defendants, Officer Tollison, Officer Morgan,
and Major Joe Tyson, as to the complaint filed pursuant to 42 U.S.C. §1983 and this action is dismissed without
prejudice as to defendant Officer Morgan, and with prejudice for lack of prosecution and for failure to comply with this
court’s orders pursuant to Rule 41(b) as to defendants Officer Tollison and Major Joe Tyson.
This action was (check one):
tried by a jury, the Honorable
tried by the Honorable
presiding, and the jury has rendered a verdict.
presiding, without a jury and the above decision was reached.
O decided by the Honorable J. Michelle Childs, Chief United States District Judge, adopting the Report and
Recommendation set forth by the Honorable Jacquelyn D. Austin, United States Magistrate Judge, which recommended
the dismissal of this action with prejudice.
Date: June 22, 2017
ROBIN L. BLUME, CLERK OF COURT
Signature of Clerk or Deputy Clerk
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?