Ashby v. Tollison et al

Filing 63

JUDGMENT / The court has ordered that this action is dismissed without prejudice as to defendant Officer Morgan, and with prejudice for lack of prosecution and for failure to comply with this court's orders pursuant to Rule 41(b) as to defendants Officer Tollison and Major Joe Tyson. (abuc)

Download PDF
AO 450 (SCD 04/2010) Judgment in a Civil Action UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT for the District of South Carolina William Mark Ashby, Plaintiff v. Officer Tollison; Officer Morgan; Major Joe Tyson, ) ) ) ) ) Civil Action No. 8:16-cv-02581-JMC Defendants JUDGMENT IN A CIVIL ACTION The court has ordered that (check one): ’ the plaintiff (name) recover from the defendant (name) which includes prejudgment interest at the rate of the amount of %, plus postjudgment interest at the rate of dollars ($ ), %, along with costs. ’ the plaintiff recover nothing, the action be dismissed on the merits, and the defendant (name) recover costs from the plaintiff (name) . O other: the plaintiff, William Mark Ashby, shall take nothing of the defendants, Officer Tollison, Officer Morgan, and Major Joe Tyson, as to the complaint filed pursuant to 42 U.S.C. §1983 and this action is dismissed without prejudice as to defendant Officer Morgan, and with prejudice for lack of prosecution and for failure to comply with this court’s orders pursuant to Rule 41(b) as to defendants Officer Tollison and Major Joe Tyson. This action was (check one): ’ tried by a jury, the Honorable ’ tried by the Honorable presiding, and the jury has rendered a verdict. presiding, without a jury and the above decision was reached. O decided by the Honorable J. Michelle Childs, Chief United States District Judge, adopting the Report and Recommendation set forth by the Honorable Jacquelyn D. Austin, United States Magistrate Judge, which recommended the dismissal of this action with prejudice. Date: June 22, 2017 ROBIN L. BLUME, CLERK OF COURT s/A. Buckingham Signature of Clerk or Deputy Clerk

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?