Whetstone v. Thrash et al

Filing 20

JUDGMENT / The court has ordered that this action is dismissed without prejudice. (abuc) (Main Document 20 replaced on 6/13/2017) (abuc, ).

Download PDF
AO 450 (SCD 04/2010) Judgment in a Civil Action UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT for the District of South Carolina Anthony Brian Whetstone, registered trade name/business entity, and Whetstone, Anthony Brian registered trade name holder and real party in interest, Plaintiff v. Chief Judge Thomas W Thrash, Jr., in his personal capacity and Jane Doe Thrash husband and wife and their marital community; William S. Duffey, Jr., in his personal capacity and Jane Doe Duffy husband and wife and thieir marital community; John A. Horn, in his personal capacity and Jane Doe Horn husband and wife and their marital community, Defendants Civil Action No. 8:17-cv-00748-JFA ) ) ) ) ) JUDGMENT IN A CIVIL ACTION The court has ordered that (check one): ’ the plaintiff (name) recover from the defendant (name) which includes prejudgment interest at the rate of the amount of %, plus postjudgment interest at the rate of dollars ($ ), %, along with costs. ’ the plaintiff recover nothing, the action be dismissed on the merits, and the defendant (name) recover costs from the plaintiff (name) . O other: the plaintiff, Anthony Brian Whetstone, shall take nothing of the defendants; Chief Judge Thomas W. Thrash, Jr., William S. Duffey, Jr., and John A. Horn, from the complaint filed pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983 and this action is dismissed without prejudice. This action was (check one): O decided by the Honorable Joseph F. Anderson, Jr., United States District Judge, presiding, adopting the Report and Recommendation set forth by the Honorable Jacquelyn D. Austin, United States Magistrate Judge, which recommended dismissing the complaint without prejudice. Date: June 13, 2017 ROBIN L. BLUME, CLERK OF COURT s/A. Buckingham Signature of Clerk or Deputy Clerk

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?