Williams v. Federal Bureau of Prisons et al
ORDER AND OPINION adopting 8 Report and Recommendation, dismissing the petition without prejudice. Signed by Honorable Richard M Gergel on 6/27/2017.(abuc)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
DISTRICT OF SOUTH CAROLINA
Deontre Devyon Williams,
Federal Bureau of Prisons, FCl-2, and
J.G. Holland, Complex Warden ,
Civil Action No. 8:17-1125-RMG
ORDER AND OPINION
This matter is before the Court on the Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate
Judge, recommending the petition for habeas relief under 28 U.S.C. § 2241 be summarily
dismissed without prejudice and without requiring Respondent to file a return.
Petitioner was convicted and was sentenced in the District of South Carolina.
challenges the Bureau of Prison's calculation of his sentence, arguing he is entitled to nine
additional months of credit for pretrial detention. The Court cannot address the merits of the
petition, however, because Petitioner is incarcerated at the Federal Medical Center in Butner,
North Carolina, which is located in the Eastern District of North Carolina. The proper Respondent,
the warden in Butner, North Carolina, is not within the personal jurisdiction of this Court. See
Rumsf eld v. Padilla, 542 U.S. 426, 442 (2004) (explaining territorial limitations on district courts'
ability to grant habeas relief).
Because this Court does not have power to grant the writ of habeas corpus Petitioner seeks,
the Magistrate Judge recommended dismissal without prejudice for lack of jurisdiction, so
Petitioner may bring his petition for habeas relief in the Eastern District of North Carolina, which
is the appropriate court. Petitioner has filed no objections. The Court agrees fully with the
recommendation of the Magistrate Judge, and therefore ADOPTS the Report and
Recommendation (Dkt. No. 8) as the Order of the Court and DISMISSES WITHOUT
PREJUDICE the petition for habeas relief under 28 U.S.C. § 2241 (Dkt. No. 1).
AND IT IS SO ORDERED.
Charleston, South Carolina
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?