Singletary v. Edgefield Sheriff Department et al

Filing 31

ORDER adopting Report and Recommendations of Magistrate Judge Bristow Marchant. The complaint is therefore DISMISSED as against Defendants Edgefield Sheriffs Department, Magistrate Judge Brenda Carpenter and Edgefield Detention Center without prejudice and without issuance and service of process. Signed by Honorable Terry L Wooten on 12/21/2011.(cwhi, )

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF SOUTH CAROLINA

William Singletary, Jr.,
Plaintiff,
vs.
Edgefield Sheriff Department, et al.,
Defendants.
____________________________________

)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)

Civil Action No. 9:11-2658-TLW-BM

ORDER
On October 4, 2011, the Plaintiff, William Singletary, Jr. (“Plaintiff”), proceeding pro se,
filed this civil action construed as an action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. (Doc. # 1).
The matter now comes before this Court for review of the Report and Recommendation
(“the Report”) filed by Magistrate Judge Bristow Marchant, to whom this case had previously
been assigned. In the Report, the Magistrate Judge recommends that Plaintiff’s complaint be
dismissed as against Defendants Edgefield Sheriff’s Department, Magistrate Judge Brenda
Carpenter and Edgefield Detention Center without prejudice and without issuance and service of
process pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B). (Doc. # 26). Objections were due on December
15, 2011. Plaintiff has filed no objections to the Report.
This Court is charged with conducting a de novo review of any portion of the Magistrate
Judge’s Report and Recommendation to which a specific objection is registered, and may accept,
reject, or modify, in whole or in part, the recommendations contained in that Report. 28 U.S.C. §
636. In the absence of objections to the Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge,
this Court is not required to give any explanation for adopting the recommendation. See Camby
v. Davis, 718 F.2d 198, 199 (4th Cir. 1983).

The Court has carefully reviewed the Magistrate Judge’s Report and Recommendation.
For the reasons articulated by the Magistrate Judge, it is hereby ORDERED that the Magistrate
Judge’s Report and Recommendation is ACCEPTED. (Doc. # 26). The complaint is therefore
DISMISSED as against Defendants Edgefield Sheriff’s Department, Magistrate Judge Brenda
Carpenter and Edgefield Detention Center without prejudice and without issuance and service of
process.
IT IS SO ORDERED.

December 21, 2011
Florence, South Carolina

__s/Terry L. Wooten______
United States District Judge