Ferola v. Byars et al
Filing
172
JUDGMENT in favor of Officer Fulton against Michael J Ferola. (mcam)
AO 450 (SCD 04/2010) Judgment in a Civil Action
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
for the
District of South Carolina - Beaufort Division
Michael J. Ferola
Plaintiff
v.
Civil Action No.
9:13CV02413-RBH
William R. Byars, Jr.,
Gregory Knowlin, Kenneth Sharp,
Willie Eagleton, Maria Leggins.
Jerry Adger, Mrs. Brackenberry,
Ann Hallman, Captain Rogers,
Lt. Powell, Lt. Brayboy, Lt. Wheeler,
Cpl. Miller, Cpl. Conyers, Officer Fulton,
Michael Bowers, Major West,
Associate Warden Sellers,
Associate Warden McFadden,
Ms. Graves, IGC , Evans
Defendants
JUDGMENT IN A CIVIL ACTION
The court has ordered that (check one):
’ the plaintiff (name)
recover from the defendant (name)
which includes prejudgment interest at the rate of
the amount of
%, plus postjudgment interest at the rate of
dollars ($
),
%, along with
costs.
O the plaintiff recover nothing of Defendants:
Officer Fulton, as to the deliberate indifference claim and summary judgment having been previously granted as
to the denial of access to the courts claim;
Defendants, Mrs. Brackenberry, Ann Hallman, Willie Eagleton, Maria Leggins. Captain Rogers, Lt. Powell,
Lt. Brayboy, Lt. Wheeler, Cpl. Miller, Cpl. Conyers, Major West, Associate Warden Sellers, Associate Warden
McFadden and Ms. Graves, IGC, Evans, having been previously dismissed without prejudice; William R. Byars, Jr.,
Gregory Knowlin, Kenneth Sharp, Jerry Adger and Michael Bowers having been previously dismissed with prejudice
this action is hereby dismissed.
This action was (check one):
O tried by a jury, the Honorable R. Bryan Harwell presiding, as to defendant, Officer Fulton, on the deliberate
indifference claim, and the jury has rendered a verdict.
G tried by the Honorable
presiding, without a jury and the above decision was reached.
CLERK OF COURT
August 23 , 2016
s/Maxine Campbell, Deputy Clerk
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?