Ferola v. Byars et al

Filing 172

JUDGMENT in favor of Officer Fulton against Michael J Ferola. (mcam)

Download PDF
AO 450 (SCD 04/2010) Judgment in a Civil Action UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT for the District of South Carolina - Beaufort Division Michael J. Ferola Plaintiff v. Civil Action No. 9:13CV02413-RBH William R. Byars, Jr., Gregory Knowlin, Kenneth Sharp, Willie Eagleton, Maria Leggins. Jerry Adger, Mrs. Brackenberry, Ann Hallman, Captain Rogers, Lt. Powell, Lt. Brayboy, Lt. Wheeler, Cpl. Miller, Cpl. Conyers, Officer Fulton, Michael Bowers, Major West, Associate Warden Sellers, Associate Warden McFadden, Ms. Graves, IGC , Evans Defendants JUDGMENT IN A CIVIL ACTION The court has ordered that (check one): ’ the plaintiff (name) recover from the defendant (name) which includes prejudgment interest at the rate of the amount of %, plus postjudgment interest at the rate of dollars ($ ), %, along with costs. O the plaintiff recover nothing of Defendants: Officer Fulton, as to the deliberate indifference claim and summary judgment having been previously granted as to the denial of access to the courts claim; Defendants, Mrs. Brackenberry, Ann Hallman, Willie Eagleton, Maria Leggins. Captain Rogers, Lt. Powell, Lt. Brayboy, Lt. Wheeler, Cpl. Miller, Cpl. Conyers, Major West, Associate Warden Sellers, Associate Warden McFadden and Ms. Graves, IGC, Evans, having been previously dismissed without prejudice; William R. Byars, Jr., Gregory Knowlin, Kenneth Sharp, Jerry Adger and Michael Bowers having been previously dismissed with prejudice this action is hereby dismissed. This action was (check one): O tried by a jury, the Honorable R. Bryan Harwell presiding, as to defendant, Officer Fulton, on the deliberate indifference claim, and the jury has rendered a verdict. G tried by the Honorable presiding, without a jury and the above decision was reached. CLERK OF COURT August 23 , 2016 s/Maxine Campbell, Deputy Clerk

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?