Maldonado v. South Carolina, State of et al
JUDGMENT: This case is dismissed without prejudice pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(b). The Plaintiff shall take nothing on his Complaint filed pursuant to Title 42 U.S.C.§ 1983. (cwhi, )
AO 450 (Rev. 01/09) Judgment in a Civil Action
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
District of South Carolina
Danielle Star Maldonado,
South Carolina, State of; Lexington County
Detention Center; Lexington County Sheriff’s
Office; Correct Care Solutions; Governor Nikki
Haley; Captain Adam Myrick; Dtective Shannon
Dykes; NFN Stark,
Civil Action No.
JUDGMENT IN A CIVIL ACTION
The court has ordered that (check one):
’ the plaintiff (name)
interest at the rate of
recover from the
the amount of
), which includes prejudgment
%, along with costs.
%, plus postjudgment interest at the rate of
’ the plaintiff recover nothing, the action be dismissed on the merits, and the defendant (name)
recover costs from the plaintiff (name)
other: The Report and Recommendations of United States Magistrate Judge Bristow Marchant is
accepted. This case is dismissed without prejudice pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(b).
The Plaintiff shall take nothing on his Complaint filed pursuant to Title 42 U.S.C.§ 1983.
This action was (check one):
’ tried by a jury with Judge
rendered a verdict.
presiding, and the jury has
’ tried by Judge
without a jury and the above decision
decided by Judge
Honorable R. Bryan Harwell,CO PY States District Judge
A TRUE United
ATTEST: LARRY W . PROPES, CLERK
April 03, 2017
CLERK OF COURT
s/Chondra S. White
Signature of Clerk or Deputy Clerk
s/Chondra S. White
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?