Glass v. Rockwell Collins Inc et al

Filing 36

ORDER adopting 32 Report and Recommendation. It is ordered that defendants' motion to dismiss plaintiff's intentional infliction of emotional distress claim is granted with prejudice, and granted without prejudice as to plaintiff's civil conspiracy and negligent misrepresentation claims. It is further ordered that the magistrate judge's report and recommendation is adopted as the order of this Court. Signed by Honorable Patrick Michael Duffy on 05/10/2018. (egra, )

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF SOUTH CAROLINA
CHARLESTON DIVISION
Sara B. Glass,
Plaintiff,
vs.
Rockwell Collins, Inc.; Lockheed Martin
Corp.; RFD Beaufort, Inc.; Lee Tincher;
and Brian Grealish,
Defendants.

)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)

C.A. #9:17-2380-PMD-MGB

ORDER

This matter is before the court upon the magistrate judge's recommendation that defendants’
motion to dismiss be granted with prejudice as to plaintiff’s intentional infliction of emotional distress
claim, and granted without prejudice as to her civil conspiracy and negligent misrepresentation claims.
The record includes the report and recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge made in
accordance with Local Civil Rule 73.02(B)(2)(g) and 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(A) and (B).
This Court is charged with conducting a de novo review of any portion of the magistrate judge's
report to which a specific objection is registered, and may accept, reject, or modify, in whole or in part,
the recommendations contained in that report. 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1). No objections have been filed to
the magistrate judge’s report.
A review of the record indicates that the magistrate judge's report accurately summarizes this
case and the applicable law. For the reasons articulated by the magistrate judge, it is ORDERED that
defendants’ motion to dismiss plaintiff’s intentional infliction of emotional distress claim is GRANTED
WITH PREJUDICE, and GRANTED WITHOUT PREJUDICE as to plaintiff’s civil conspiracy and
negligent misrepresentation claims.
ORDERED, that the magistrate judge’s report and recommendation is adopted as the order of
this Court.

AND IT IS SO ORDERED.

May 10, 2018
Charleston, South Carolina

2