Long v. Daugaard, et al
Filing
19
ORDER denying 15 Motion. Signed by U. S. District Judge Richard H. Battey on 10/19/2011. (SLT)
I ED
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
DC 19 201
DISTRICT OF SOUTH DAKOTA
SOUTHERN DIVISION
CHARLES LONG,
Plaintiff,
vs.
DENNIS DAUGAARD, Governor of
South Dakota; TIM REISCH, Secretary
of Prisons; and DOUGLAS WEBER,
Warden, S.DS.P.,
Defendants.
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
CIV 11-4042-RHB
ORDER
Plaintiff, Charles Long, has commenced this action under 42 U.s.c. § 1983
alleging that his constitutional rights were violated by defendants. In an Order dated
May 18, 2011, the Court, acting under 28 U.s.c. §§ 1915 and 1915A, determined that
Long's complaint provided insufficient details and failed to state a claim upon which
relief could be granted. The matter was dismissed without prejudice. Long now
requests the Court compel the disclosure of legal papers by named defendants.
As stated previously, this matter has been dismissed without prejudice for failure
to state a claim upon which relief may be granted and that disposition has been
affirmed by the Eighth Circuit. Long has not indicated with specificity the documents
which he seeks, nor shown their necessity or relevance to the attempt to amend his
complaint. Accordingly, it is hereby
ORDERED that plaintiff's motion for legal documents (Docket #15) is denied.
Dated thisL!l-!J;; of October, 2011.
BY THE COURT:
CHARD H. BATTEY
UNITED STATES DISTRICT IUD
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?