Peterson v. United States of America

Filing 3

ORDER. The United States Attorney for the District of South Dakota will serve and file an answer or responsive pleading to the petition, together with a legal brief or memorandum in support thereof, on or before Monday, January 7, 2013. Signed by US Magistrate Judge John E. Simko on 12/6/12. (DJP)

Download PDF
FILED UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF SOUTH DAKOTA DEC 062012 (~~ SOUTHERN DIVISION **************************************************** * AZIZIA PETERSON CIV. 12-4189 * * Movant, * ORDER * -vs­ * * UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, * * Respondent. * * **************************************************** Petitioner, Azizia Peterson, filed a pro se motion to vacate, set aside, or correct her sentence pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2255. Peterson is incarcerated at the Federal Correctional Institution in Waseca, Minnesota. From a reading of the Petition, the court cannot determine that "it plainly appears from the face of the petition ... that the petitioner is not entitled to relief in the district court" warranting summary dismissal pursuant to Rule 4 ofthe Rules Governing Section 2255 Cases in the United States District Court. In her Petition, Peterson notes that on May 19, 2010, "United States Attorney General Eric Holder, Jr. issued a Memorandum concluding that the FSA's new mandatory minimum sentencing provisions apply to all sentencings that occur on or after August 3, 2010, regardless of when the offense conduct took place." See Doc. 1 at p. 2. Peterson also asserts her "10 year sentence is subject to collateral attack based on the Fair Sentencing Act of2010. A new sentencing hearing is required because applying the FSA mandatory minimums to her current sentence, results in her facing a lower sentence, that is not a mandatory minimum." See Doc. 1 at p. 3. On August 3, 2010, the Fair Sentencing Act ("FSA") was enacted, raising the amount of cocaine base required for imposition of a mandatory minimum sentence. See Pub. L. No. 111-220, 124 Stat. 2372 (2010). The United States Supreme Court has held that the more lenient penalties ofthe FSA apply to those offenders whose crimes occurred before the effective date ofthe FSA, but who were sentenced after that date. Dorseyv. United States. 132 S.Ct. 2321 (2012). The FSA took effect on August 2, 2010. Peterson's crime occurred before August 3, 2010, and she was sentenced after August 3, 2010, on December 6, 2010. It appears that the FSA applies to Peterson, possibly reducing her statutory mandatory minimum sentence from 10 years to 5 years. The Court's preliminary review indicates, however, that Peterson's sentencing guideline range would not change from the 120-150 month range determined at her sentencing hearing. The Government is directed to respond to these issues. Therefore, it is ORDERED that the Clerk of Court will deliver or serve a copy ofthe motion on the United States Attorney for the District of South Dakota. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED thatthe United States Attorney for the District ofSouth Dakota will serve and file an answer or responsive pleading to the petition, together with a legal brief or memorandum in support thereof, on or before Monday, January 7, 2013. Dated this ~ day of~l~et, 2012. BY THE COURT: John Unite 2 imko tates Magistrate Judge

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?