Lohnes v. Weber et al

Filing 9

ORDER denying as moot 2 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis; denying as moot 4 Motion to Stay; adopting 7 Report and Recommendation; overruling 8 Objection to Report and Recommendation. A Certificate of Appealability shall not issue. Signed by U. S. District Judge Lawrence L. Piersol on 1/15/13. (DJP)

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF SOUTH DAKOTA FILED JAN 15 2013 SOUTHERN DIVISION ~~ * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *~--* ~~ * * BURTON LOHNES, CIV. 12-4196 * * Petitioner, * -vsORDER * * DOUGLAS WEBER, Warden, * * Respondent. * * **************************************************** Petitioner Burton Lohnes, an inmate at the South Dakota State Penitentiary, has applied for a writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254. The Magistrate Judge issued a Report and Recommendation recommending that the Petition be dismissed without prejudice. The Court has reviewed the file including the timely filed objections ofPetitioner Lohnes to the Report and Recommendation ofJudge Simko. None ofthe objections overcome the findings and recommendations of Judge Simko in the Report and Recommendation. Accordingly, the Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus of Petitioner Burton Lohnes is denied without prejudice for failure to exhaust his state remedies and for failure to seek permission to file a second or successive petition. IT IS ORDERED that: 1. Petitioner's objections (Doc. 8) are OVERRULED and the Report and Recommendation (Doc. 7) is ADOPTED. 2. Petitioner's application for writ of habeas corpus is dismissed without prejudice. 3. A Certificate of Appealability shall not issue. Dated this 15th day of January, 2013. BY THE COURT: awrence L. Piersol United States District Judge ATTEST: JOSEPH HAAS, CLERK By: \y~ b~~ , Deputy

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?