Burgos-Valdez v. United States of America

Filing 29

ORDER denying 26 Objection to Report and Recommendation.; granting [] Motion to Dismiss; denying as moot 23 Motion to Expedite; adopting 25 Report and Recommendation. A Certificate of Appealability shall not issue. Signed by U.S. District Judge Lawrence L. Piersol on 3/16/15. (DJP)

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF SOUTH DAKOTA SOUTHERN DIVISION FILED MAR 16 2015 ~~ *************************************************** * JOSE ENRIQUE BURGOS-VALDEZ, CIV 13-4047 * * Petitioner, * * vs. ORDER * * UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, * * Defendant. * * *************************************************** Petitioner Jose Enrique Burgos-Valdez, a federal inmate incarcerated at the Federal Correctional Institution in Big Spring, Texas, has filed a Motion to Vacate, Set Aside or Correct Sentence pursuant to 28 U.S. C. § 2255. The Magistrate Judge issued a Report and Recommendation recommending the Motion to Vacate be denied. The Petitioner filed Objections to the Report and Recommendation, and after conducting an independent review of the record, the Court agrees with the Magistrate Judge. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED: 1. That the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation (Doc. 25) is ADOPTED by the Court and Plaintiffs Objections to the Report and Recommendation (Doc. 26) are DENIED as no factual or legal basis was shown to establish or even suggest any error in the Report and Recommendation. 2. That Petitioner's Motion to Expedite Decision (Doc. 23) is DENIED as moot. 3. That Petitioner Jose Enrique Burgos-Valdez's Motion to Vacate, Set Aside, or Correct his Sentence (Doc. 1) DENIED. 4. That Respondent's Motion to Dismiss (Doc. 16) is GRANTED. 5. That a Certificate of Appealability shall not issue. Dated this 16th day of March, 2015. BY THE COURT: ~·w~l~SOL I.:~ence L. Piersol ATTEST: JOSEPH HAAS, ~LERK BY: ~~ vili),5 b Deputy United States District Judge

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?