Thompson v. Dooley et al
ORDER adopting 94 Report and Recommendation; denying as moot 41 Motion for Preliminary Injunction. Signed by U.S. District Judge Karen E. Schreier on 8/25/17. (SLW)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
DISTRICT OF SOUTH DAKOTA
TERRY L. THOMPSON,
JOSH KLIMEK, Unit Manager; DIANE
ROMKEMA, Case Manager; JERRAME
LARSEN, D-H-O Hearing Officer; and
LEE KAUFENBERG, Correctional
ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND
RECOMMENDATION AND DENYING
MOTION FOR PRELIMINARY
Plaintiff, Terry L. Thompson, filed this lawsuit under 42 U.S.C. § 1983.
The case was referred to Magistrate Judge Veronica Duffy under 28 U.S.C.
§ 636(b)(1)(B) for a report and recommendation on several motions, including
Thompson’s motion for preliminary injunction asking for an injunction
requiring defendants to return two boxes of his property to him. (Docket 41).
On August 7, 2017, the magistrate judge submitted her report and
recommended that Thompson’s motion for a preliminary injunction be denied
Thompson was notified in the report and recommendation that he had
14 days to file objections to the report. The deadline for objections was August
24, 2017. No objections were filed by August 24, 2017. Even though no
objections were filed that would require de novo review under Thompson v. Nix,
897 F.2d 356 (8th Cir. 1990), the court reviewed the matter de novo and finds
that the magistrate judge's report and recommendation is adopted in full.
Therefore, it is
The report and recommendation of the magistrate judge (Docket
94) is adopted in full.
Thompson’s motion for temporary preliminary injunction (Docket
41) is DENIED as moot.
Dated August 25, 2017.
BY THE COURT:
/s/ Karen E. Schreier
KAREN E. SCHREIER
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?