Linson v. Klimek et al
ORDER granting 20 Motion to Stay Discovery. Signed by U.S. District Judge Roberto A. Lange on 4/26/2017. (JLS)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
DISTRICT OF SOUTH DAKOTA
TODD D. LINSON,
ORDER GRANTING MOTION
TO STAY DISCOVERY
JOSH KLIMEK, TAMMY DEJONG,
Plaintiff Todd D. Linson ("Linson") filed a pro se civil rights lawsuit
pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Doc. 1. This Court screened Linson's complaint,
directed service of his complaint, and requested that the parties file proposed
scheduling orders. Doc. 5; Doc 15. Defendants now move to stay discovery
until the court determines the issue of qualified immunity. Doc. 20.
Pursuant to Rule 26(c), "the court has discretion to stay discovery on
other issues until the critical issue has been decided." 8A Charles Alan Wright,
Arthur R. Miller, and Richard L. Marcus, Federal Practice and Procedure
§ 2040(3d ed.); Steinbuch v. Cutler, 518 F.3d 580, 588 (8th Cir. 2008)(citi,ng
Lakin v. Prudential Sec., Inc., 348 F.3d 704, 713 (8th Cir. 2003)); see also
Maune v. Int'lBhd. ofElec. Workers, 83 F.3d 959, 963 (8th Cir. 1996)
(upholding the district court's granting of a party's request to stay discovery).
Because the qualified immunity issue may be dispositive, the court grants
defendants' motion to stay discovery. ^
Linson argues that the court should not grant the motion. He argues
that defendants are merely trying to stall the litigation by moving for a
protective order because they are not entitled to qualified immunity. Although
defendants could have responded to this Court's order or moved for a stay of
discovery in a more timely manner, whether defendants are entitled to
qualified immunity is unclear at this point. Linson also argues that this Court
denied defendants' defense of qualified immunity, but this is not correct.
Accordingly, it is ORDERED,
1. Defendants' motion for protective order (Docket 20) is granted.
Discovery will be stayed until the court determines the issue of
qualified immunity. If summary judgment is denied, the stay on
discovery will be lifted.
2. Defendants shall file their motion for summary judgment by May 25,
Dated Eebruary j^, 2017.
BY THE COURT:
ROBERTO A. LANGE
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?