Camberos-Villapuda v. United States of America

Filing 19

ORDER granting 8 Motion to Dismiss; adopting 15 Report and Recommendation. A certificate of appealability is denied. Signed by U.S. District Judge Karen E. Schreier on 8/14/18. (DJP)

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF SOUTH DAKOTA SOUTHERN DIVISION LUCIANO CAMBEROS-VILLAPUDA, 4:17-CV-04161-KES Movant, vs. ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION AND DISMISSING MOTION UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Respondent. Movant, Luciano Camberos-Villapuda, filed a motion under 28 U.S.C. ' 2255 to vacate, set aside, or correct sentence by a person in federal custody. Docket 1. The court referred the motion to Magistrate Judge Veronica Duffy. On June 14, 2018, Magistrate Judge Duffy submitted a report and recommended that respondent’s motion to dismiss be granted and that all of Camberos-Villapuda’s claims for relief be dismissed. Docket 15. The time for objections has passed and no objections to the report and recommendation have been filed under 28 U.S.C. ' 2254, Rule 8(b)(3). The court has considered the case de novo and adopts the report and recommendation in full. Thus, it is ORDERED that the magistrate judge=s report and recommendation (Docket 15) is adopted in full and respondent’s motion to dismiss (Docket 8) is granted. 1 IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that based upon the reasons set forth herein and under Fed. R. App. P. 22(b), the court finds that petitioner has not made a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right. 28 U.S.C. ' 2253(c)(2). Therefore, a certificate of appealability is denied. DATED this 14th day of August, 2018. BY THE COURT: /s/ Karen E. Schreier KAREN E. SCHREIER UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?