Camberos-Villapuda v. United States of America
Filing
19
ORDER granting 8 Motion to Dismiss; adopting 15 Report and Recommendation. A certificate of appealability is denied. Signed by U.S. District Judge Karen E. Schreier on 8/14/18. (DJP)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
DISTRICT OF SOUTH DAKOTA
SOUTHERN DIVISION
LUCIANO CAMBEROS-VILLAPUDA,
4:17-CV-04161-KES
Movant,
vs.
ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND
RECOMMENDATION AND
DISMISSING MOTION
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Respondent.
Movant, Luciano Camberos-Villapuda, filed a motion under
28 U.S.C. ' 2255 to vacate, set aside, or correct sentence by a person in
federal custody. Docket 1. The court referred the motion to Magistrate Judge
Veronica Duffy. On June 14, 2018, Magistrate Judge Duffy submitted a
report and recommended that respondent’s motion to dismiss be granted and
that all of Camberos-Villapuda’s claims for relief be dismissed. Docket 15. The
time for objections has passed and no objections to the report and
recommendation have been filed under 28 U.S.C. ' 2254, Rule 8(b)(3). The
court has considered the case de novo and adopts the report and
recommendation in full. Thus, it is
ORDERED that the magistrate judge=s report and recommendation
(Docket 15) is adopted in full and respondent’s motion to dismiss (Docket 8) is
granted.
1
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that based upon the reasons set forth
herein and under Fed. R. App. P. 22(b), the court finds that petitioner has not
made a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right. 28 U.S.C.
' 2253(c)(2). Therefore, a certificate of appealability is denied.
DATED this 14th day of August, 2018.
BY THE COURT:
/s/ Karen E. Schreier
KAREN E. SCHREIER
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?