Levin et al v. Islamic Republic of Iran et al

Filing 21

ORDER granting 19 Motion to Stay. Signed by U.S. District Judge Karen E. Schreier on 5/7/2021. (CLR)

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF SOUTH DAKOTA SOUTHERN DIVISION JEREMY LEVIN and DR. LUCILLE LEVIN, Plaintiffs, vs. 4:20-MC-00035-KES ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO STAY ISLAMIC REPUBLIC OF IRAN; IRANIAN MINISTRY OF INFORMATION AND SECURITY; SEYYED ALI HOSSEINI KHAMENEI; MOHAMMED MOHAMMED NIK; ISLAMIC REVOLUTIONARY GUARD CORP, Defendants. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Intervenor. Plaintiffs and intervenor jointly move to stay this case, and all current deadlines, pending final resolution of appeals taken in Levin v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., Civ. A. No. 21-0420 (D.D.C.) or Levin v. Islamic Republic of Iran, Civ. A. No. 05-2484 (D.D.C.). Docket 19. A “district court [has] the inherent power to grant [a] stay in order to control its docket, conserve judicial resources, and provide for a just determination of the cases pending before it.” Contracting Northwest, Inc. v. City of Fredericksburg, Iowa, 713 F.2d 382, 387 (8th Cir. 1983). The issues pending before the D.C. Circuit overlap with the issues this court will address. The court finds that the interest of judicial economy justifies staying this proceeding pending resolution of the pending appeals. Thus, it is ORDERED that the joint motion to stay (Docket 19) is granted. Dated May 7, 2021. BY THE COURT: /s/ Karen E. Schreier KAREN E. SCHREIER UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?