Jones v. United States of America
Filing
14
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER re: Attorney-Client Privilege Waiver, granting 12 Motion. Signed by US Magistrate Judge John E. Simko on 4/2/13. (Attachments: # 1 Attorney-Client Privilege Waiver) (SLW)
FILED
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
APR 02 2013
DISTRICT OF SOUTH DAKOTA
~~
WESTERN DIVISION
*********** ****************************************
*
CIY 13-5008
RONALD JOSEPH JONES,
*
*
Movant,
*
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND
*
vs.
ORDER RE: ATTORNEY-CLIENT
*
PRIVILEGE WAIVER
*
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
*
*
Respondent.
*
*
************ ***************************************
The Government has requested an Order Directing Fonner Defense Counsel to Respond to
Defendant's Claims of Ineffective Assistance set forth in the Movant's Motion under 28 U.S.C.
§ 2255. The Eighth Circuit Court ofAppeals has recognized that the attorney-client privilege may
be impliedly waived when a client attacks his attorney's competence and raises the issue of
ineffectiveness or incompetence of counsel. See Tasby v. United States, 504 F.2d 332 (8th Cir.
1974). ABA Model Rule of Professional Conduct 1.6 also recognizes that a disclosure may be
impliedly authorized under certain circumstances including when a lawyer must respond to
allegations in any proceeding concerning the lawyer's representation of his or her client.
The American Bar Association, however, has issued an opinion advising that fonner counsel
confronted with a client making ineffective assistance ofcounsel claims, consistent with their ethical
obligations (1) may not disclose infonnation imparted to him or her in confidence without first
obtaining the infonned consent ofthe fonner client; and (2) may only disclose such infonnation in
"court-supervised testimony." ABA Comm. on Eth. and Profl Responsibility, Fonnal Op. 10-456
(July 14, 2010).
In consideration ofthe allegations set forth in Movant's Motion under 28 U.S.C. § 2255 this
Court has detennined that the Government cannot respond to the allegations ofineffective assistance
---
--._--------
of counsel without Attorney Ellery Grey responding by affidavit to the specific allegations in the
Motion concerning his representation of Movant. If Movant opposes the waiver of the Attorney
Client privilege as it relates to the specific allegations in his Motion under 28 U.S.C. § 2255, those
allegations will be stricken from Movant's Motion under 28 U.S.C. § 2255. Accordingly,
IT IS ORDERED:
1.
The Respondent's Motion (Doc. 12) directing former defense counsel to respond and
for extension is granted as follows:
A.
That the Clerk shall send this Order and the attached Attorney-Client
Privilege Waiver form to Movant;
B.
That ifthe Attorney-Client Privilege Waiver form is not signed and returned
to the Clerk for filing within 21 days, the allegations of ineffective assistance
of counsel will be stricken from Movant's Motion under 28 U.S.C. § 2255;
C.
That if the Attorney-Client Privilege Waiver form is signed and filed, the
Government shall forward a copy of the signed Attorney-Client Privilege
Waiver form to Attorney Ellery Grey, along with a copy of this Order and
Movant's § 2255 Motion. Attorney Ellery Grey shall within 14 days of
receiving the Attorney-Client Privilege Waiver form provide and file with the
Clerk an affidavit responding to the specific allegations in the § 2255 Motion
concerning his representation of Movant.
D.
The United States shall file its response within 14 days after receiving Mr.
Grey's affidavit.
Dated this.;L day of April, 2013.
BY THE COURT:
States Magistrate Judge
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?