Gamache v. Federal Bureau of Investigation et al
Filing
4
ORDER: the Court finds that Plaintiff has failed to state a claim for which relief may be granted. The Court ACCEPTS and ADOPTS Magistrate Judge Lee's 3 R&R and ORDERS that Plaintiff's case be DISMISSED pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B). Signed by District Judge Harry S Mattice, Jr on 4/12/2011. Serviced to Greg Gamache. (BJL, )
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE
at CHATTANOOGA
GREG GAMACHE,
)
)
Plaintiff,
)
)
v.
)
)
FEDERAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION, )
et al.,
)
)
Defendants.
)
Case No. 1:11-cv-55
Judge Mattice
ORDER
In response to Plaintiff’s Motion for Leave to Proceed In Forma Pauperis [Court Doc.
1], Magistrate Judge Susan Lee filed a Report and Recommendation (“R&R”) [Court Doc.
3] on March 17, 2011 recommending that Plaintiff’s Complaint be dismissed pursuant to
28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B). Magistrate Judge Lee concluded that Plaintiff’s Complaint
failed to state a colorable, justiciable action, that his allegations smack of the “fantastic,”
and that it was therefore unnecessary to reach the merits of his in forma pauperis
application. Magistrate Judge Lee further determined that the factual allegations in
Plaintiff’s Complaint failed to establish that he had standing to assert any claims against
Defendants. Plaintiff did not file an Objection to Magistrate Judge Lee’s R&R within the
given 14 days.
The Court is directed to dismiss a cause of action proceeding in forma pauperis
pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B) if it becomes apparent that the action is frivolous,
does not state a claim, or seeks relief from an immune defendant. Id. In the Complaint,
Plaintiff appears to be asserting that Defendants are not properly responding to the
complaints of 40,000 people in the United States who are having “electronic weapons”
used on them. After reviewing the Complaint, the Court agrees with Magistrate Judge
Lee’s characterization of Plaintiff’s allegations as “fantastic.” The Court also agrees that
Plaintiff’s Complaint fails to allege facts that would support a personal injury to him and
would establish his standing to bring such claims.
Accordingly, the Court finds that Plaintiff has failed to state a claim for which relief
may be granted. The Court ACCEPTS and ADOPTS Magistrate Judge Lee’s R&R and
ORDERS that Plaintiff’s case be DISMISSED pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B).
SO ORDERED this 12th day of April, 2011.
/s/Harry S. Mattice, Jr.
HARRY S. MATTICE, JR.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
-2-
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?