McCurty v. Social Security Administration, Commissioner of

Filing 10

ORDER adopting 8 Report and Recommendations. Signed by District Judge Harry S Mattice, Jr on October 8, 2014. (CNC, ) Mailed to George Bell McCurty(CNC, ).

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE at CHATTANOOGA GEORGE BELL MCCURTY, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) ) COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY, ) ) ) Defendant. ) ) Case No. 1:14-cv-13 Judge Mattice Magistrate Judge Lee ORDER On September 17, 2014, United States Magistrate Judge Susan K. Lee filed a Report and Recommendation (Doc. 8) pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1) and Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 72(b). Magistrate Judge Lee recommended that Plaintiff’s action be dismissed for failure to comply with court orders and failure to properly serve the Defendant.1 Plaintiff has filed no objections to the Magistrate Judge’s Report and Recommendation.2 Nevertheless, the Court has reviewed the record in this matter, and it agrees with the Magistrate Judge’s well-reasoned conclusions.                                                              1   The Court’s electronic docket reflects that Magistrate Judge Lee’s Report and Recommendation was returned as undeliverable on September 24, 2014. (Doc. 9). However, this is the address that Plaintiff provided to receive communications from the Court and, if he has been released from custody, he has failed to provide an updated address to receive communications from the Court.   2 Magistrate Judge Lee specifically advised Plaintiff that he had 14 days in which to object to the Report and Recommendation and that failure to do so would waive his right to appeal. (Doc. 8); see Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b)(2); see also Thomas v. Arn, 474 U.S. 140, 148-51 (1985) (noting that “[i]t does not appear that Congress intended to require district court review of a magistrate's factual or legal conclusions, under a de novo or any other standard, when neither party objects to those findings”). Accordingly, the Court ACCEPTS and ADOPTS Magistrate Judge Lee’s findings of fact and conclusions of law. Plaintiff’s case is hereby DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. SO ORDERED this 8th day of October, 2014. /s/ Harry S. Mattice, Jr._______ HARRY S. MATTICE, JR. UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 2   

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?