Ross et al v. Kopocs et al
Filing
108
ORDER: All parties SHALL file any motion challenging the admissibility of expert testimony, with supporting memorandum and the expert report at issue, no later than April 14, 2015. To the extent Plaintiffs disclose any rebuttal ex perts as provided in the Courts March 26, 2015 Order [Doc. 102], any motion challenging the admissibility of said rebuttal expert testimony SHALL be due no later than 21 days from the disclosure. The Court will set a hearing on any such motions, if deemed necessary, in due course. The Clerk is DIRECTED to term the notice/motion [Doc. 105].Signed by Magistrate Judge Susan K Lee on 4/1/2015. (aws, )
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE
AT CHATTANOOGA
SETH PATRICK ROSS, et al.,
Plaintiffs,
v.
FRANK KOPOCS, et al.,
Defendants.
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
No. 1:14-cv-60-SKL
ORDER
Before the Court is “Plaintiffs’ Notice of Need for a Daubert Hearing” regarding the
admissibility of the expert testimony of one of Defendants’ experts, Gary L. Holbrook, which was
docketed as a motion [Doc. 105].
The admissibility of any expert’s testimony will be determined under Fed. R. Evid. 702 and
the standards established by the Supreme Court in Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc.,
509 U.S. 579 (1993) and its progeny. It appears this case involves a challenge to the admissibility
of some or all of the testimony of at least one expert. Accordingly, all parties SHALL file any
motion challenging the admissibility of expert testimony, with supporting memorandum and the
expert report at issue, no later than April 14, 2015. To the extent Plaintiffs disclose any rebuttal
experts as provided in the Court’s March 26, 2015 Order [Doc. 102], any motion challenging the
admissibility of said rebuttal expert testimony SHALL be due no later than 21 days from the
disclosure. The Court will set a hearing on any such motions, if deemed necessary, in due course.
The Clerk is DIRECTED to term the notice/motion [Doc. 105].
SO ORDERED.
ENTER:
s/fâátÇ ^A _xx
SUSAN K. LEE
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?