Anderson v. The City of Graysville, Tennessee et al
Filing
48
ORDER granting 40 Motion to Withdraw as Attorney. Attorney Daniel H Rader, III and Randall A York terminated. Signed by Magistrate Judge Susan K Lee on 8/25/2016. (CNC, ) Mailed to Erik Redden (CNC)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE
AT CHATTANOOGA
RICK ANDERSON,
Plaintiff,
v.
THE CITY OF GRAYSVILLE,
TENNESSEE, et al.,
Defendants.
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
1:14-cv-347-HSM-SKL
ORDER
Before the Court is a motion to withdraw as counsel of record for Defendant Erik Redden
(“Defendant Redden”) filed by attorneys Daniel H. Rader, III and Randall A. York with the law
firm of Moore, Rader, Fitzpatrick & York, P.C. [Doc. 40]. A hearing was held on the motion on
August 23, 2016. Present were Attorneys Rader, York, Bryan H. Hoss for Plaintiff, Keith Grant
for Defendant The City of Graysville, Tennessee, and Nathan D. Rowell for Defendants Vice
Mayor Denesa Reel and Commissioners Michael May and Andy Beene. Defendant Erik Redden
was not present at the hearing, although he was properly advised of the date and time of the
hearing.
Attorneys Rader and York represented that throughout the pendency of the case,
communications with Defendant Redden have been inconsistent and particularly difficult since his
criminal conviction on May 9, 2016. Attorneys Rader and York further advised that they are no
longer being compensated for their representation of Defendant. Attorneys Rader and York
represented to the Court, and provided the Court with a copy of a letter dated August 3, 2016 to
Defendant Redden, wherein they provided him with a copy of the motion to withdraw. Attorneys
Rader and York represented to the Court that they also notified Defendant Redden of the hearing
date and time. Attorneys Rader and York advised the Court that Defendant Redden is not
currently in custody and therefore could have attended the hearing on the motion to withdraw. In
addition, Attorney Hoss reported that he had a direct telephone conversation with Defendant
Redden who said he was representing himself and wanted to reschedule his deposition.
There was no objection to the withdrawal of Attorneys Rader and York asserted by any
party. The motion to withdraw, copy of the letter which provided Defendant Redden with a copy
of the motion to withdraw, and further representations by Attorneys Rader and York that they
notified Defendant Redden of the date and time of the hearing and that they have complied with all
of the requirements of E.D. Tenn. L.R. 83.4 for withdrawal satisfy all requirements to withdraw
under E.D. Tenn. L.R. 83.4.
Accordingly, the motion to withdraw [Doc. 40] is GRANTED.
The Clerk is
DIRECTED to terminate attorneys Daniel H. Rader, III and Randall A. York with the law firm of
Moore, Rader, Fitzpatrick & York, P.C. as counsel of record for Defendant Redden and to mail a
copy of this Order to Defendant Redden at the address reflected on the Notice of Address,
Telephone Number, and Email of Erik Redden [Doc. 47].
Attorneys Rader and York are ORDERED to send this Order to Defendant Redden by
mail and email.
Defendant Redden is forewarned that he must comply with all requirements of the
Court’s scheduling order and local rules or risk a default judgment against him in this
action.
SO ORDERED.
ENTER:
_
s/fâátÇ ^A _xx
SUSAN K. LEE
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?