Johnson v. Stokes

Filing 6

ORDER ACCEPTS in WHOLE Report and Recommendations re 4 Report and Recommendations.The action is DISMISSED. The Clerk of Court is DIRECTED to mail a copy of this Order to Plaintiff and CLOSE the case. Signed by District Judge Harry S Mattice, Jr on 2/29/2016. (SAC, )Order mailed to Johnson.

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE AT CHATTANOOGA ROBERT P. JOHNSON, Plaintiff, v. CASEY STOKES, Judge Meigs County, Defendant. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Nos. 1:15-CV-59-HSM-SKL-1 ORDER This civil matter is before the Court on the Report and Recommendation entered by United States Magistrate Judge Susan K. Lee on June 8, 2015 (“R&R”) [Doc. 4]. In the R&R, Magistrate Judge Lee recommends dismissal of the complaint for failure to comply with Prison Litigation Reform Act (“PLRA”) procedures outlined in 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(2) or remedy that deficiency within the period provided in the Court’s April 2, 2015 order [Doc. 3].1 There have been no timely objections to the R&R, and enough time has passed since the filing of the R&R to treat any objections as having been waived. See 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1); Fed. R. Civ. P. 72. After careful review of the matter, the Court is in agreement with Magistrate Judge Lee’s recommendation, which the Court adopts and incorporates into its ruling. Accordingly, the Court ACCEPTS IN WHOLE the R&R [Doc. 4]; the action is DISMISSED. The Clerk of Court is DIRECTED to mail a copy of this Order to Plaintiff and CLOSE the case. 1 Under the PLRA, any prisoner who files a complaint in a district court must tender the full filing fee or file (1) an application to proceed in forma pauperis without prepayment of fees and (2) a certified copy of his inmate trust account for the previous six-month period. 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(2). Plaintiff did neither and failed to remedy the deficiency within the period allowed. SO ORDERED. /s/ Harry S. Mattice, Jr._______ HARRY S. MATTICE, JR. UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?