Cottrell v. Social Security Administration, Commissioner of (PLR1)

Filing 24

JUDGMENT ORDER: for the reasons stated in the Report and Recommendation, which the Court adopts and incorporates into its ruling, that the plaintiff's motion for summary judgment [R. 14] is DENIED; the Commissioner's motio n for summary judgment [R. 17] is GRANTED; the Commissioner's decision in this case denying plaintiff's application for benefits under the Social Security Act is AFFIRMED; and this case is DISMISSED. Signed by District Judge Pamela L Reeves on September 26, 2017. (AYB)

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE

RITA COTTRELL,
Plaintiff,
v.
COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY,
Defendant.

)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)

No. 1:16-CV-00147
REEVES/STEGER

JUDGMENT ORDER

For the reasons stated in the Memorandum Opinion filed contemporaneously with
this Judgment Order, the Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge [R. 20] is
ACCEPTED IN WHOLE under 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1) and Fed.R.Civ.P. 72(b).
IT IS ORDERED, for the reasons stated in the Report and Recommendation, which
the Court adopts and incorporates into its ruling, that the plaintiff’s motion for summary
judgment [R. 14] is DENIED; the Commissioner’s motion for summary judgment [R. 17]
is GRANTED; the Commissioner’s decision in this case denying plaintiff’s application
for benefits under the Social Security Act is AFFIRMED; and this case is DISMISSED.
Enter:
_____
______________________________________
_________________________________
__
__
_
_
_
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
UNI
UNITED STATES DISTRICT
T E
T CT
CT

1