McGee v. Cider et al (TV1)
Filing
4
ORDER accepting in whole 3 Report and Recommendations. The Court hereby ORDERS that plaintiff's complaint be DISMISSED in its entirety and the Clerk ofCourt is directed to CLOSE this case. Signed by Chief District Judge Thomas A Varlan on 12/29/2016. (copy mailed) (KMK, )
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE
RODERICK D. McGEE,
Plaintiff,
v.
CHA POLICE OFFICER CIDER,
DETECTIVE EARLY,
CHA POLICE DEPARTMENT, and
CRIMINAL INVESTIGATIONS DIV,
Defendants.
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
No.:
1:16-CV-353-TAV-CHS
ORDER
This case is before the Court on the Report and Recommendation entered by
United States Magistrate Christopher H. Steger, on December 1, 2016 (the “R&R”) [Doc.
3]. In the R&R, Magistrate Judge Steger recommends that plaintiff’s complaint be
dismissed under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2) for failing to state a legal claim upon which relief
can be granted, because the claim is barred by the statute of limitations. There have been
no timely objections to the R&R, and enough time has passed since the filing of the R&R
to treat any objections as having been waived. See 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1); Fed. R. Civ. P.
72.
After a careful review of the matter, the Court is in agreement with Magistrate
Judge Steger’s recommendations, which the Court adopts and incorporates into its ruling.
Accordingly, the Court ACCEPTS IN WHOLE the R&R [Doc. 3]. The Court hereby
ORDERS that plaintiff’s complaint be DISMISSED in its entirety and the Clerk of
Court is directed to CLOSE this case.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
s/ Thomas A. Varlan
CHIEF UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
ENTERED AS A JUDGMENT
s/ Debra C. Poplin
CLERK OF COURT
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?