Dawson v. McMinn County Justice Center et al
Filing
47
JUDGMENT ORDER, Defendants' motion for summary judgment 34 is GRANTED, and this pro se prisoners civil rights action, filed under 42 U.S.C. § 1983, is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. All other pending motions are DENIED as m oot. Because the Court CERTIFIED in the memorandum opinion that any appeal from this order would not be taken in good faith, should Plaintiff file a notice of appeal, he is DENIED leave to appeal in forma pauperis. Signed by District Judge Thomas A. Varlan on 11/10/20. (c/m) (ADA)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE
TIMOTHY M. DAWSON,
Plaintiff,
v.
NURSE KAY STANSBERRY, and
BENNI RICHINSON,
Defendants.
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
No.:
1:18-CV-42-TAV-CHS
JUDGMENT ORDER
For the reasons set forth in the memorandum opinion filed contemporaneously with
this order, Defendants’ motion for summary judgment [Doc. 34] is GRANTED, and this
pro se prisoner’s civil rights action, filed under 42 U.S.C. § 1983, is DISMISSED WITH
PREJUDICE. All other pending motions are DENIED as moot. Because the Court
CERTIFIED in the memorandum opinion that any appeal from this order would not be
taken in good faith, should Plaintiff file a notice of appeal, he is DENIED leave to appeal
in forma pauperis. See 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3); Fed. R. App. P. 24.
The Clerk is DIRECTED to close the file.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
s/ Thomas A. Varlan
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
ENTERED AS A JUDGMENT
s/ John L. Medearis
CLERK OF COURT
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?