Dawson v. McMinn County Justice Center et al

Filing 47

JUDGMENT ORDER, Defendants' motion for summary judgment 34 is GRANTED, and this pro se prisoners civil rights action, filed under 42 U.S.C. § 1983, is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. All other pending motions are DENIED as m oot. Because the Court CERTIFIED in the memorandum opinion that any appeal from this order would not be taken in good faith, should Plaintiff file a notice of appeal, he is DENIED leave to appeal in forma pauperis. Signed by District Judge Thomas A. Varlan on 11/10/20. (c/m) (ADA)

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE TIMOTHY M. DAWSON, Plaintiff, v. NURSE KAY STANSBERRY, and BENNI RICHINSON, Defendants. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) No.: 1:18-CV-42-TAV-CHS JUDGMENT ORDER For the reasons set forth in the memorandum opinion filed contemporaneously with this order, Defendants’ motion for summary judgment [Doc. 34] is GRANTED, and this pro se prisoner’s civil rights action, filed under 42 U.S.C. § 1983, is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. All other pending motions are DENIED as moot. Because the Court CERTIFIED in the memorandum opinion that any appeal from this order would not be taken in good faith, should Plaintiff file a notice of appeal, he is DENIED leave to appeal in forma pauperis. See 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3); Fed. R. App. P. 24. The Clerk is DIRECTED to close the file. IT IS SO ORDERED. s/ Thomas A. Varlan UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE ENTERED AS A JUDGMENT s/ John L. Medearis CLERK OF COURT

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?